Guided Metadata Tagging for Online Content Repositories

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current online content repositories face challenges in discoverability due to inconsistent and inadequate tagging of content, as users lack guidance in selecting appropriate metadata tags, leading to reduced visibility of compelling content.

Innovation Solution

A server-based method for guided content metadata tagging, which prompts users for an initial taxonomy category and suggests additional tags based on a knowledgebase, visually depicting tag weights and relationships to facilitate coherent and rich tagging, thereby improving the discoverability of content objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users are responsible for tagging content themselves, then the tagging process is simple and quick, but the quality of tagging varies widely and is often inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetagging process simplicityVSAvoidtagging quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates and suggests tags based on content analysis, allowing the system to serve itself in the tagging process rather than relying solely on user expertise. The automatic tag generation serves the content objects, while users can still review and modify tags as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to users by suggesting tags based on automated analysis and presenting a ranked list of relevant tags. This feedback loop allows users to quickly verify or correct automated suggestions, improving tagging quality without requiring users to perform the entire tagging process manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If users manually select tags from available options, then tagging is straightforward, but the availability of appropriate tags depends on user motivation rather than systematic guidance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetag selection simplicityVSAvoidtag availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-analyzing content and generating tag suggestions before the user needs to tag the content. The automated tag generation happens in advance, providing a ready-made list of relevant tags that reduces the user's workload and ensures comprehensive tag availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated tag generation system acts as an intermediary between the content and the user. Instead of users directly selecting from a static taxonomy, the intermediary system analyzes content characteristics and generates personalized tag suggestions, bridging the gap between available taxonomy and user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If content is uploaded without proper tags, then the upload process remains simple, but the content becomes less discoverable by other users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupload speedVSAvoidcontent discoverability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically tags uploaded content without requiring users to manually assign tags during the upload process. The automatic tagging happens in the background, maintaining simple and fast upload functionality while ensuring that all content receives appropriate tags for discoverability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The tag generation occurs as a preliminary action during or after the upload process, before the content becomes visible to other users. This ensures that content is tagged automatically and available for discovery from the moment it is uploaded, maintaining both upload simplicity and discoverability reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8126912B2Guided content metadata tagging for an online content repository
Publication Date: 2012.02.28 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US8126912B2 patent drawing
  • US8126912B2 patent drawing
  • US8126912B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for tagging content. The method includes receiving an initial metadata tag and associating the initial metadata tag with an object of an online repository. Based on the initial metadata tag, a metadata tag knowledgebase is accessed to derive at least one suggested metadata tag. A confirmation regarding the at least one suggested metadata tag is received and the suggested metadata tag is associated with the object. The object is then uploaded to the repository, and the metadata tag knowledgebase is updated to reflect tags associated with the object.