Guided Soft Target for Crash Avoidance Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current crash avoidance technology testing methods face challenges in replicating realistic crash scenarios while minimizing hazards and equipment damage, and in providing a consistent radar and sensor signature for various collision types, especially at high speeds.

Innovation Solution

A Guided Soft Target system comprising a soft target vehicle or pedestrian form attached to a programmable, autonomously guided Dynamic Motion Element, which can replicate pre-crash motions and follow predetermined trajectories, ensuring realistic and safe collision scenarios with consistent sensor signatures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a rigid target vehicle is used to simulate real vehicles, then the sensor signature consistency is improved, but the physical risk to test personnel and damage to equipment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor signature consistencyVSAvoidphysical risk and equipment damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a soft, flexible outer shell or skin covering the target vehicle structure. This flexible covering maintains the external geometry and radar cross-section similar to a real vehicle, ensuring consistent sensor signatures, while being compliant enough to reduce impact forces and physical risk during collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The target vehicle employs composite construction combining rigid internal framework with soft external materials. This composite structure preserves the geometric shape and sensor signature characteristics of real vehicles while using energy-absorbing materials to minimize physical risk and damage during impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a soft target is used to minimize physical risk, then the safety is improved, but the sensor signature consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical riskVSAvoidsensor signature consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a carefully engineered flexible outer shell that maintains the target vehicle's external geometry and radar cross-section. This shell is designed to be compliant for safety while preserving the geometric fidelity needed for consistent sensor signatures across different collision scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts physical parameters of the soft target materials, such as density, elasticity, and surface texture, to optimize the balance between safety and sensor signature consistency. By controlling these parameters, the target maintains realistic radar and sensor characteristics while minimizing physical risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Weight of moving object

If a heavy target vehicle is used to simulate real-world mass, then the collision realism is improved, but the ease of repositioning and reusability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget vehicle massVSAvoidrepositioning and reusability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The target vehicle is divided into modular segments or components that can be easily disconnected and repositioned. This segmentation allows the target to be quickly moved between test locations and reused for multiple collision scenarios without requiring heavy equipment for repositioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic positioning systems such as electric motors, hydraulic actuators, or electric scooters to automatically reposition the target vehicle between tests. This dynamic repositioning capability allows the target to be moved easily despite its mass, improving reusability and operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If a complex guided motion system is added to replicate pre-crash motions, then the test scenario realism is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash scenario replication capabilityVSAvoidguided motion system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guided motion system is designed with multi-functionality to perform multiple operations: positioning the target vehicle, replicating pre-crash motions, and coordinating with subject vehicles. By consolidating these functions into a single integrated system, the patent reduces overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive test scenario replication capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a centralized control system or coordinator that acts as an intermediary between the guided motion system and subject vehicles. This mediator manages the complex coordination required for realistic crash scenarios, simplifying the control architecture by centralizing the decision-making and communication functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8428863B2Devices, systems, and methods for testing crash avoidance technologies
Publication Date: 2013.04.23 DYNAMIC RES INC
  • US8428863B2 patent drawing
  • US8428863B2 patent drawing
  • US8428863B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A Guided Soft Target (GST) system and method provides a versatile test system and methodology for the evaluation of various crash avoidance technologies. This system and method can be used to replicate the pre-crash motions of the CP in a wide variety of crash scenarios while minimizing physical risk, all while consistently providing radar and other sensor signatures substantially identical to that of the item being simulated. The GST system in various example embodiments may comprise a soft target vehicle or pedestrian form removably attached to a programmable, autonomously guided, self-propelled Dynamic Motion Element (DME), which may be operated in connection with a wireless computer network operating on a plurality of complimentary communication networks. Specific DME geometries are provided to minimize ride disturbance and observability by radar and other sensors. Computer controlled DME braking systems are disclosed as well as break-away and retractable antenna systems.