Guided Tool Workflow With Real-Time Validation for Workpiece Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current industrial application management systems are inefficient and costly due to poor record keeping, ineffective training, and inadequate monitoring, leading to errors and costly events such as Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC) in facilities like refineries and chemical plants.

Innovation Solution

A workflow management system that includes a guidance device communicatively coupled to tools and sensors, which collects and uploads identification, industrial application, and workpiece state data, performs data analytics, and provides workflow instructions to users, enabling real-time monitoring and error detection, thereby improving data accuracy and reducing adverse events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional manual record-keeping and monitoring methods are used in industrial applications, then operational flexibility is maintained, but data accuracy and reliability deteriorate leading to costly errors and LOPC events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects data from sensors and tools, uploads it to a service for analysis, and uses the results to generate workflow instructions that are fed back to workers through guidance devices. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures data accuracy and enables real-time error detection and correction, directly resolving the reliability issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A service acts as an intermediary between the field devices (sensors, tools, guidance devices) and the central system. This intermediary handles data aggregation, validation, and analysis, reducing the complexity burden on individual components while maintaining high data accuracy through centralized quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive data collection and monitoring systems are implemented, then error detection capability is improved, but overhead and paperwork increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detectionVSAvoidoverhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs data collection, validation, and analysis without requiring manual intervention. Sensors and tools self-report their status and performance data, which is then automatically processed by the service to generate workflow instructions, eliminating the need for manual paperwork and reducing overhead significantly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual record-keeping and monitoring activities are replaced by an automated electronic system that collects, transmits, and analyzes data automatically. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with automated electronic systems reduces overhead while enhancing error detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If real-time data upload and validation is performed for every operation, then quality control is improved, but productivity is reduced due to additional verification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality controlVSAvoidworkflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs validation and analysis on a selective basis rather than uniformly for all operations. The service intelligently determines which data points require detailed validation based on risk assessment and historical patterns, applying partial verification to low-risk operations and excessive verification to high-risk operations, thus balancing quality control with productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Loss of information

If multiple data points are collected and validated at each workflow step, then loss of information is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data collection, validation, storage, and analysis functions into a unified service architecture. Multiple data points from various sensors and tools are combined into a single data stream that is processed centrally, reducing the complexity at individual device levels while ensuring complete data capture and validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240069517A1System and method for guiding operations on a workpiece
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 CUMULUS DIGITAL SYSTEMS INC
  • US20240069517A1 patent drawing
  • US20240069517A1 patent drawing
  • US20240069517A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to at least one aspect of the present disclosure a method of managing workflow for an industrial application is provided. The method comprises providing a guidance device configured to be communicatively coupled to a tool configured to be used on a workpiece, obtaining identification data pertaining to the workpiece being used in the industrial application, obtaining industrial application state data pertaining to at least one state of the industrial application, obtaining workpiece state data, operating the tool on the workpiece, obtaining tool operation data, uploading to a service, via the guidance device, at least one of the identification data, the industrial application state data, and the tool operation data, and validating the industrial application state data.