Guided Validation of Customized Integrated Computing System Configurations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional integrated computing systems face challenges in achieving timely and efficient customization due to frequent changes in component availability and complex dependencies among multiple components, leading to inefficient integration processes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for guided validation of customized integrated computing system configurations, which includes generating design elements associated with components, validating user-selected components against standardized templates, and modifying configurations to ensure compatibility and optimal performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional integrated computing systems are customized to meet unique user resource needs, then adaptability is improved, but the complexity of validating and ensuring compatibility among multiple components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidvalidation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex validation task into separate validation rules associated with each design element. Each rule independently validates specific compatibility criteria, allowing the system to manage complexity by processing validation in modular segments rather than as a monolithic complex validation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms that detect validation failures and provide guidance for correction. When design elements fail to meet compatibility criteria, the system automatically identifies the issues and guides users through the correction process, reducing the manual validation complexity burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If component specifications are abstracted to manage life cycles and reduce obsolescence exposure, then reliability is improved, but the complexity of managing design elements and their relationships increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobsolescence resistanceVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates abstracted design element representations that copy the essential characteristics of physical components while eliminating specific obsolescent details. These abstracted design elements maintain the functional relationships and compatibility criteria of actual components without being tied to specific hardware generations, thereby achieving obsolescence resistance through conceptual abstraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If automated validation and correction of configurations is implemented, then productivity is improved, but the complexity of the validation system and its rules increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes validation rules and compatibility criteria before configuration occurs. By preparing the validation framework in advance with predefined rules for each design element type, the system enables rapid automated validation during configuration without requiring complex real-time analysis, thus improving productivity through preliminary system preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9891984B1System and method for guided validation of a customized integrated computing system configuration
Publication Date: 2018.02.13 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US9891984B1 patent drawing
  • US9891984B1 patent drawing
  • US9891984B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated computing system configuration system includes a computing system that executes an application to receive a customized integrated computing system configuration having multiple design elements (DEs) that are associated with multiple components of a customized integrated computing system. The application may then, for at least DE, determine whether one or more other DEs in the customized integrated computing system configuration meet a specified criteria associated with the at least one DE, and when at least one of the other DEs does not meet the specified criteria such that the customized integrated computing system configuration comprises a invalid configuration, correct the invalid configuration by modifying one or more of the other DEs such that the customized integrated computing system configuration comprises a valid configuration.