Guillotine CD DVD Destruction Device with Serrated Blade

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for destroying digital data storage devices like CDs and DVDs are either inefficient or not designed for large-scale destruction, lacking a reliable and efficient mechanism to render disks unreadable.

Innovation Solution

A guillotine-style destruction device with a downwardly descending blade and a tray system that supports disks in an intersecting fashion, allowing for the severing and collection of multiple disks, featuring a serrated blade and a pivoting handle mechanism for efficient incision and separation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a manual splitter device is used to destroy CDs/DVDs, then the device structure is simple, but the destruction efficiency is low and cannot handle large-scale destruction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedestruction efficiencyVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into distinct functional modules: a tray system for holding multiple disks, a vertical passageway for blade movement, and a collection chamber for destroyed disks. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while maintaining overall system manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple destruction functions are combined into a single guillotine blade mechanism that can process multiple disks simultaneously. The tray system and collection chamber are integrated with the blade mechanism to create a unified destruction system that handles loading, cutting, and collection in one operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If a guillotine blade is used to sever multiple disks, then the destruction effectiveness is high, but the blade needs precise guidance to ensure clean cuts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedestruction effectivenessVSAvoidblade guidance mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Guidance walls are introduced as intermediary structures that channel and constrain the blade movement. These walls act as mediators between the blade and the disks, ensuring the blade follows a precise vertical path through the stack of disks without requiring complex active control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The blade is designed to move vertically through a standardized passageway that maintains consistent alignment and spacing. This creates an equipotential path where the blade encounters uniform resistance and guidance throughout its cutting stroke, ensuring reliable destruction of any disk placed in the tray.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

3Productivity

If disks are stacked in a tray for simultaneous destruction, then the productivity increases, but the tray design must ensure proper alignment and support for multiple disks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebatch destruction capacityVSAvoidtray structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tray system utilizes vertical stacking of disks rather than horizontal arrangement. By organizing disks in the vertical dimension along the blade's path of travel, the system maximizes batch processing capacity without requiring a large horizontal footprint or complex positioning mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The tray is designed with universal support features that accommodate various disk types and orientations. The guidance walls and support surfaces are configured to work with any standard optical disk, making the tray system adaptable to different destruction scenarios without requiring reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If a serrated blade is used for incising disks, then the cutting effectiveness is improved, but the blade design becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting effectivenessVSAvoidblade design
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The serrated teeth are applied only to the specific portion of the blade that contacts the disks during cutting. This localized application of complexity provides enhanced cutting effectiveness at the critical interface while keeping the rest of the blade structure simple and easy to manufacture and replace.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables quick and effective destruction of multiple digital storage disks, similar to paper shredders, ensuring data cannot be read again, with variants accommodating different configurations for efficient operation.

Implementation Method 1

A blade, and is guidably supported upon the body for displacing the blade within said passageway for incising the disks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS10513046B2CD/DVD guillotine destruction device
Publication Date: 2019.12.24 BUSSELL JEFFREY A
  • US10513046B2 patent drawing
  • US10513046B2 patent drawing
  • US10513046B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A guillotine style destruction device for severing one or more data carrying disks including a body having an extending passageway defined therein and a disk containing cartridge or support incorporated or positioned within the body and for supporting the disks in intersecting fashion relative to an interior passageway. A handle supports a blade, and is guidably supported relative to the body for displacing the blade within the passageway for incising the disks. The body includes a disk supporting tray at an upper end and, optionally, an incised disk removal tray, drawer or collection receptacle at a bottom end. The blade can be incorporated into either of a pivoting or vertically descending handle and, upon inserting one or more CD's or disks associated with the upper tray, incises the disk to assist traveling into the lower deposit and removal area.