Guillotine Obturating Valve for Stem-Free Molding Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing injection molding technologies suffer from flow perturbations and defects due to the presence of stems or guillotines that cause material buildup, stagnation, and uneven flow, leading to waste and product defects.

Innovation Solution

A guillotine obturation valve with rotatable members that control the flow of molten material by rotating to translate obturating members along orthogonal or inclined axes, eliminating stems and reducing pressure drops, and allowing precise, compact, and synchronized actuation of multiple obturating members.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a stem is used to control the flow of molten material, then the flow can be regulated, but flow perturbations increase and material buildup occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow controlVSAvoidflow perturbations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the stem component from the injection molding system, replacing it with a guillotine valve mechanism that closes the channel without requiring a stem extending into the flow path. This eliminates the source of flow perturbations and material buildup while maintaining flow control capability through the valve's closing action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Productivity

If oblique stems are used to control multiple injectors, then simultaneous opening and closing is achieved, but material is pushed against the channel surface causing defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimultaneous controlVSAvoidmaterial defects
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the oblique stem mechanism entirely and replaces it with guillotine valves that close vertically at the channel outlet. This eliminates the squeezing effect that pushes material against the channel surface, preventing defects while maintaining the ability to simultaneously control multiple injectors through a centralized actuation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using stems that push material from the inlet side, the invention uses guillotine valves that close from the outlet side, inverting the control mechanism. This reversal prevents material from being compressed against the channel walls during the closing action, eliminating the defect-causing squeezing effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Productivity

If a single movable guillotine is used, then multiple injectors can be controlled, but material is squashed toward the nozzle perimeter causing defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-injector controlVSAvoidproduct defects
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the single guillotine valve into multiple individual guillotine valves, each positioned at or near the outlet of its respective injector channel. This segmentation allows each valve to close locally without pushing material laterally, eliminating the squashing effect while maintaining simultaneous control capability through coordinated actuation of all valves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If two opposing guillotines are used with distant actuators, then closing point is at channel center, but actuation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing position accuracyVSAvoidactuation mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the complex distant actuator mechanism, replacing it with simple local actuators positioned near each guillotine valve. This simplification maintains the ability to achieve precise closing positions while eliminating the need for complicated long-distance actuation systems with multiple linkages and synchronization mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces material waste, eliminates defects, and ensures uniform flow and precise control of molten material, enhancing injector performance and mold durability.

Implementation Method 1

a portion of the obturating member is coupled, in particular directly, to the rotatable member so that a rotation of the rotatable member entails a translation of the obturating member along the second axis from and/or toward said point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical coupling conversion: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentEP4392220B1Guillotine obturation valve for injection molding
Publication Date: 2025.08.20 INGLASS SPA
  • EP4392220B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4392220B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4392220B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6

AI summary

An obturation valve is described for controlling a flow of molten material exiting a nozzle towards a mold cavity, comprising: • a channel, for the molten material, which extends along a first axis, • an obturating member mounted - movably along a respective second axis, and - so that a free end of the obturating member can move towards, and reach, a point inside the channel to throttle the channel thereby regulating said flow, • a rotatable member placed in proximity of the nozzle, wherein a portion of the obturating member is coupled to the rotatable member so that a rotation of the rotatable member entails a translation of the obturating member along the second axis from and/or towards said point.