Self-Supporting Gutter Guard With Irregular Grooves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional gutter guards often require additional support structures or corrugations to maintain stability, which can reduce the permeable surface area and lead to debris accumulation, compromising their effectiveness in heavy weather conditions.

Innovation Solution

A self-supporting gutter guard design featuring irregular grooves that provide structural integrity without the need for additional framing or corrugations, allowing for a larger permeable surface area and improved debris prevention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional gutter guards use additional support structures or corrugations to maintain stability, then structural strength is improved, but permeable surface area is reduced and debris accumulation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidpermeable surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The gutter guard is divided into multiple segments or panels that can be assembled together, allowing each segment to have optimized structural features while maintaining overall permeability. The segmentation enables localized reinforcement without compromising the entire surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gutter guard employs asymmetric or irregular groove patterns rather than uniform corrugations. This asymmetric design provides structural strength where needed while preserving permeable surfaces in other areas, preventing debris accumulation by creating varied surface profiles that disrupt debris flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Strength

If conventional gutter guards use additional support structures or corrugations to maintain stability, then structural strength is improved, but debris accumulation increases compromising effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddebris accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Irregular grooves create varied surface profiles that disrupt debris flow patterns, preventing accumulation. The asymmetric design ensures debris does not settle in uniform patterns, maintaining gutter effectiveness during heavy weather.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The use of curved or rounded groove profiles instead of sharp angular corrugations creates smoother surfaces that allow debris to slide off more easily, reducing accumulation while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Strength

If conventional gutter guards use corrugations to add strength, then structural strength is improved, but the design becomes more complex and manufacturing difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The gutter guard is manufactured as segmented panels that can be produced using standard fabrication processes, then assembled on-site. This segmentation simplifies manufacturing of individual components while allowing complex overall structure to be achieved through assembly rather than complex single-piece fabrication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of creating complex corrugated structures through complicated manufacturing processes, the design inverts the approach by using simpler flat or gently curved panels with irregular grooves that are easier to manufacture, achieving strength through geometric configuration rather than complex forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Stability of the object's composition

If conventional gutter guards use separate framed support structures, then structural stability is improved, but device complexity and installation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gutter guard merges the protective screen function with the structural support function into a single integrated component. The irregular grooves are formed directly in the gutter guard material itself, eliminating the need for separate framing structures and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The gutter guard is designed to be self-supporting through its own irregular groove structure, eliminating the need for external framing supports. The structure serves its own support requirements through the geometric configuration of the grooves, simplifying both device complexity and installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260098405A1Gutter guard with irregular grooves
Publication Date: 2026.04.09 GUTTERGLOVE
  • US20260098405A1 patent drawing
  • US20260098405A1 patent drawing
  • US20260098405A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A self-supporting gutter guard device is described having a bridge member composed of a decking material having a plurality of orifices, and having a roof side and an opposing gutter lip side, at least one groove disposed in the decking material altering a profile of the deck material to outline a 3-dimensional geometry that spans the bridge member from a proximal end of the bridge member's roof side to a proximal end of the bridge member's gutter lip side, a roof attachment member configured to attach to the roof side of the bridge member, and a gutter attachment member configured to attach to the gutter lip side of the bridge member, wherein the 3-dimensional geometry of the at least one groove enables the device to be self-supporting.