H-Shape Play Structure Stability via Fixed Plate Angles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing child play structures are either too complex and costly, making them unsuitable for smaller children, or they are simple but lack stability and supervision ease, often collapsing if used incorrectly.

Innovation Solution

A child play structure composed of a main plate and two side plates, arranged to form an H-shape with fixed angles, providing stability and ease of supervision while minimizing material usage and the number of plates required, with additional corner strengthening elements for enhanced stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If large complex structures with many different areas are used, then children have more play areas, but the structure becomes costly and complex to set up

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplay areasVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The play structure is divided into separate functional areas (enclosed play area and open play area) that can be independently configured. The structure uses modular panels that can be assembled in different configurations to create various play spaces, allowing versatility without requiring a single complex monolithic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The same structural panels and components serve multiple functions: they form walls, create enclosed spaces, provide open play areas, and can be configured for different age groups. The structure accommodates both small children (with enclosed areas) and older children (with open areas), making it universally applicable across different play scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Stability of the object's composition

If fully enclosed internal areas are provided, then children have a feeling of playing inside, but the structure becomes difficult to supervise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenclosed spaceVSAvoidsupervision ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The structure provides localized enclosed spaces rather than fully enclosed rooms. The enclosed play area is partially enclosed with open sides or transparent panels, giving children a sense of enclosure and security while maintaining visual and physical connection to the surrounding supervised area. This local enclosure approach satisfies children's need for private play space while eliminating supervision difficulties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If fewer panels are used to reduce complexity, then the structure is easier to supervise, but the structure may collapse if used incorrectly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of panelsVSAvoidstructure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The structure incorporates pre-designed reinforcement elements and bracing systems that are installed during assembly. Corner reinforcements, diagonal bracing, and strengthened joint connections are built into the design from the beginning, providing structural stability before the structure is put into use. This preliminary strengthening ensures the structure can withstand improper use without requiring complex additional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If more components are used to ensure stability, then the structure does not collapse, but the structure becomes complex and requires many components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure stabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple structural functions are combined into single components. For example, panels serve as both walls and structural supports, joints provide both connection and reinforcement, and certain panels incorporate both enclosure and bracing functions. This merging of functions reduces the total number of separate components needed while maintaining structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The structure uses composite construction methods where different materials and components work together to achieve strength. The combination of rigid panels, reinforced joints, and bracing elements creates a composite structural system that provides high stability without requiring each individual component to be overly complex or numerous.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP3229932B1Child play structure
Publication Date: 2020.06.03 KOMPAN
  • EP3229932B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3229932B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3229932B1 patent drawingFigure 6

AI summary

A child play structure comprising: a main plate having a max length greater than 58 cm or 80 cm and a max height greater than 58 cm or 80 cm and being arranged at an angle of less than 20 degrees to the vertical, a first side plate having a max length greater than 50 cm and a max height greater than 40 cm and being arranged at an angle of less than 20 degrees to the vertical, wherein said first side plate is fastened to the main plate in such a way that: the first side plate forms a fixed angle to the main plate of between 60 and 90 degrees and at least 30% of the max length of the first side plate extends past each side of the main plate. In this way a play structure is provided which has a very high play value and a very high stability with a low use of materials.