H4 Receptor Antagonist Compounds with Low hERG Inhibition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current H4 receptor antagonists lack optimal low nM potency, selectivity against H1-H3 receptors, metabolic stability, and safety profiles, particularly concerning hERG inhibition, which poses risks of QT syndrome.

Innovation Solution

Development of novel compounds with specific structural formulas that combine H4 receptor antagonism with low hERG activity, including compounds of formulas (1) to (7), which are metabolically stable and exhibit excellent specificity and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing H4 receptor antagonists are used, then some anti-inflammatory effect is achieved, but they lack optimal low nM potency and selectivity against H1-H3 receptors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceptor binding affinityVSAvoidselectivity against H1-H3 receptors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically modifying molecular parameters of the H4 receptor antagonist compounds. Specific changes include adjusting the R1-R6 substituent groups in the core molecular structure to optimize binding affinity to low nM concentrations while maintaining selectivity against H1-H3 receptors. The patent identifies specific substituent patterns that achieve both high affinity and selectivity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by introducing specific functional groups and substituent patterns at particular positions (R1-R6) in the molecular structure. Each position is optimized with specific chemical groups that contribute to H4 receptor binding while avoiding binding to H1-H3 receptors. The local chemical environment at each position is carefully designed to achieve selective interaction with the H4 receptor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If H4 receptor antagonists are developed, then anti-inflammatory effect is improved, but metabolic stability and safety profiles (particularly hERG inhibition) remain problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-inflammatory effectVSAvoidhERG inhibition and cardiac risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the taking out principle by removing or eliminating the problematic hERG inhibitory activity from the compound class while maintaining H4 receptor antagonism. The patent identifies and excludes structural features that cause hERG inhibition, focusing instead on substituent patterns that provide anti-inflammatory activity without cardiac side effects. The safe compounds are extracted from the broader class of H4 antagonists.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies blessing in disguise by converting potential harmful effects into beneficial outcomes. The patent identifies structural features that could potentially cause issues and instead designs compounds where these same structural elements provide selective H4 binding and anti-inflammatory activity while being inherently safe regarding hERG channels. The potential harm is transformed into a benefit through careful structural design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If new H4R antagonists are developed, then therapeutic potential is improved, but compound complexity and development requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic potentialVSAvoidcompound structure and development requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a core molecular structure that can serve multiple functions: binding to H4 receptors with high affinity, maintaining selectivity against H1-H3 receptors, ensuring metabolic stability, and avoiding hERG inhibition. The core structure with optimized R1-R6 positions provides a universal platform that achieves multiple therapeutic requirements simultaneously, reducing the need for separate optimization steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240317775A1H4 Antagonist Compounds
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 NXERA PHARMA UK LTD
  • US20240317775A1 patent drawing
  • US20240317775A1 patent drawing
  • US20240317775A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosures herein relate to novel compounds of formula (1):and salts thereof, wherein Y, Z, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5 and n are defined herein, and their use in treating, preventing, ameliorating, controlling or reducing the risk of disorders associated with H4 receptors.