Adaptive Half-Bridge Drive Waveform Control for Lower EMI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional half-bridge driver designs produce high levels of electromagnetic interference (EMI) due to high current pulses and fast switching speeds, especially at light motor loads, which are not adequately reduced by conventional adaptive pulse-width modulation without the addition of costly EMI filters.

Innovation Solution

A driver circuit with a detector to measure switching characteristics, such as the derivative of the drain-to-source voltage, is used to adjust the waveform of the drive signal, employing larger transistors in parallel and an adjustable amplifier with a current mirror to control the waveform, thereby reducing EMI without external filters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional pulse-generation arrangements with fast switching speed are used, then motor control accuracy is improved, but EMI level increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor control accuracyVSAvoidEMI level
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The driver adaptively adjusts the rise time and fall time of drive signals based on real-time detection of bridge switching characteristics. The waveform characteristics dynamically change according to operating conditions, allowing fast switching when needed while reducing EMI during light load conditions through slower, adapted transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the waveform parameters (rise time, fall time) of the drive signal adaptively. By modifying these parameters based on detected switching characteristics, the system maintains motor control accuracy while reducing EMI emissions, particularly at light loads where conventional fixed waveforms produce excessive interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If conventional half-bridge driver design is used, then device complexity is minimized, but EMI control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver circuit complexityVSAvoidEMI emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The driver includes a detector that continuously monitors the switching characteristic of the bridge circuit and feeds this information back to adaptively adjust the drive signal waveform. This feedback mechanism enables automatic EMI reduction without requiring complex external filtering circuits, maintaining simplicity while improving EMI control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The driver circuit performs self-adjustment by detecting its own operating conditions and automatically modifying its output waveform characteristics. The system serves itself by adapting to light load or heavy load conditions without external intervention, reducing EMI intrinsically rather than relying on separate filtering components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If adaptive pulse width adjustment is used, then motor load response is improved, but EMI reduction is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor load responseVSAvoidEMI level
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Beyond adapting pulse width to motor load conditions, the invention also dynamically adjusts the waveform characteristics (rise time, fall time) of the drive signals. This dual adaptation approach maintains excellent motor control response while providing additional EMI reduction that pulse width adjustment alone cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously - both pulse width and waveform shape (rise/fall times). This multi-parameter adaptation provides superior EMI reduction compared to pulse width modulation alone, while maintaining the ability to respond accurately to varying motor load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7928774B2Adaptive drive signal adjustment for bridge EMI control
Publication Date: 2011.04.19 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US7928774B2 patent drawing
  • US7928774B2 patent drawing
  • US7928774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of the invention relates to a driver adapted to provide a drive signal with an adjustable waveform for an external bridge to control EMI. The driver includes a detector configured to measure a switching characteristic of a switch in the external bridge to produce the drive signal with an adjustable waveform characteristic. The driver includes an adjustable circuit element to adjust the waveform characteristic in response to the measured switching characteristic. The measured switching characteristic may be a derivative of a voltage of the switch in the bridge such as a derivative of a drain-to-source voltage of a half-bridge circuit. The driver may be formed with an amplifier with an adjustable gain controlled by the signal produced by the detector. The adjustable gain amplifier may be formed with a transistor coupled in series with a leg of a current mirror.