Half Thrust Bearing with Inclined Surface Portions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The reduced diameter of modern crankshafts in internal combustion engines leads to lower rigidity, causing deflection and increased vibration, resulting in damage (seizure) and high friction loss due to uneven contact between the thrust collar surface and the half thrust bearing, especially when misalignment occurs during assembly.

Innovation Solution

A half thrust bearing with a semi-annular shape featuring a flat surface portion parallel to a reference plane and inclined surface portions on both sides, where the axial distance is maximum at the central portion and reduces towards the circumferential ends, preventing continuous contact between the sliding surface and the thrust collar surface, and maintaining a suitable circumferential length of the flat surface portion to minimize friction loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the crankshaft diameter is reduced to decrease engine weight, then the engine weight is reduced, but the crankshaft rigidity decreases causing deflection and vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine weightVSAvoidcrankshaft rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The sliding surface of the half thrust bearing is designed with non-uniform thickness, being thickest at the circumferential center and thinner toward the end surfaces. This local variation in geometry compensates for the reduced overall crankshaft rigidity by providing enhanced load-bearing capacity at the critical contact region, allowing the crankshaft to be lighter while maintaining sufficient local strength to resist deflection and vibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the crankshaft rigidity is low causing deflection, then the crankshaft can rotate more freely, but the thrust collar surface becomes inclined causing uneven contact and seizure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrankshaft rotationVSAvoidcontact uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sliding surface incorporates thrust reliefs at the end surfaces that create a localized thinning pattern. This allows the central portion of the sliding surface to maintain optimal contact with the thrust collar surface even when the crankshaft deflects, while the relieved end portions accommodate the inclination caused by deflection, preventing seizure and ensuring reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The thrust relief geometry is designed in advance to anticipate and compensate for the inclination that will occur during crankshaft operation. By pre-shaping the sliding surface with appropriate thickness variations, the bearing ensures uniform contact distribution even when the crankshaft experiences deflection and vibration during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Force

If the sliding surface contacts the thrust collar surface continuously, then the axial force is supported, but friction loss increases and damage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial force supportVSAvoidfriction loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The sliding surface is designed with spatially varying thickness, creating regions of different contact pressure. The thickest region at the circumferential center provides primary axial force support, while the progressively thinner regions toward the end surfaces reduce contact pressure and friction, allowing the bearing to support the required load with minimized energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration prevents damage (seizure) by ensuring the sliding surface does not continuously contact the thrust collar surface and reduces friction loss by avoiding direct contact with the circumferentially central portion during axial vibration, effectively managing the inclination of the thrust collar surface.

Implementation Method 1

the sliding surface comes into direct contact with the thrust collar surface of the crankshaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a sliding surface for receiving the axial force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentEP3415774B1Half thrust bearing
Publication Date: 2020.11.04 DAIDO METAL CO LTD
  • EP3415774B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3415774B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP3415774B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A half thrust bearing (8) having a semi-annular shape includes a sliding surface (81) for receiving an axial force (f) of a crankshaft of an internal combustion engine, and a rear surface (84a) on an opposite side of the sliding surface, and defines a reference plane (84) on the rear surface (84a) side that is perpendicular to an axial direction. The sliding surface includes a flat surface portion (81a) near a circumferentially central portion (85) and in parallel with the reference plane (84), and inclined surface portions (81b) on both sides of the flat surface portion in a circumferential direction. At any radial positions of the half thrust bearing, an axial distance between the reference plane and the sliding surface is maximum at the flat surface portion, and is reduced in the inclined surface portions toward both circumferential end portions (86) of the half thrust bearing.