Halide-Copper-Molybdenum Sorbent for Mercury Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sorbents are unable to effectively remove both organic vapors and mercury from fluid streams, posing a challenge in developing high-performance sorbents for multi-gas removal applications.

Innovation Solution

A sorbent material product is developed, comprising a surface deposition of about 0.1 wt. % to about 10 wt. % of a halide, about 0.1 wt. % to about 20 wt. % copper, and about 0.1 wt. % to about 10 wt. % molybdenum, which is applied to activated carbon or other sorbent materials to enhance mercury and organic vapor removal capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional impregnated activated carbon adsorbents are used to remove toxic vapors, then organic vapor removal performance is improved, but mercury removal capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorganic vapor removal performanceVSAvoidmercury removal capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining activated carbon with specific impregnants (copper, molybdenum, and halides) to create a sorbent that simultaneously effective against both organic vapors and mercury. The composite structure allows the activated carbon to provide general adsorption while the metal impregnants specifically target mercury, resolving the contradiction between organic vapor removal and mercury removal capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If hexavalent chromium is used as an impregnant on activated carbon, then toxic vapor removal efficiency is improved, but health safety and toxicity concerns worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoxic vapor removal efficiencyVSAvoidtoxicity and carcinogenicity to user
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces hazardous permanent impregnants like hexavalent chromium with safer, shorter-lived metal impregnants (copper and molybdenum) that can be easily removed or replaced. This substitution maintains the functional benefit of enhanced toxic vapor removal while eliminating the long-term health hazards associated with chromium impregnants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of traditional chromium impregnants into a beneficial solution by using alternative metals that provide similar or superior performance without the toxicity. The copper and molybdenum impregnants offer equivalent toxic vapor removal capability while converting the harmful chromium-based system into a safer alternative.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If a single impregnated adsorbent is used to target specific contaminants, then removal efficiency for that contaminant is improved, but effectiveness against a range of toxic agents deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval efficiency for target contaminantVSAvoideffectiveness against range of toxic agents
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a multi-functional sorbent where the activated carbon matrix provides general adsorption capability for various toxic agents, while the copper and molybdenum impregnants provide specific functionality for mercury and other metals. This multi-functional approach allows a single adsorbent to effectively handle a broad spectrum of contaminants including organic vapors, mercury, and other toxic gases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sorbent material product achieves a significant increase in mercury removal performance, with a mercury breakthrough time of at least 480 minutes, while maintaining effective removal of other contaminants such as ammonia, sulfur dioxide, cyclohexane, and CCl4.

Implementation Method 1

Sorbents such as activated carbon have long been used to remove toxic gases and vapors from fluid streams

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS20250170551A1Sorbents for removal of mercury and other contaminants
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 CALGON CARBON CORPORATION

AI summary

The present disclosure describes sorbent material products for the removal of mercury and other toxic gases. These sorbent material products may include a halide, copper, and molybdenum. Methods of preparing the sorbent material products disclosed herein and methods of removing mercury from a fluid stream using the same are also provided.