Hall-Effect Linear Motor Controller Feedback Loop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Closed-loop linear motion control systems face challenges in achieving precise control due to slow response times and mechanical hysteresis, particularly in applications without position sensor feedback.

Innovation Solution

A linear motion control device incorporating a magnetic field sensor, a coil driver, and an interface with a feedback loop that uses a difference amplifier to relate the sensor output to the coil driver input, allowing for internal sensor-to-driver feedback to compensate for non-linearities and hysteresis, and is integrated as a semiconductor integrated circuit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If closed-loop control is implemented using microcontroller with position sensor feedback, then control precision is improved, but response time increases and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the magnetic field sensor, coil driver, and control circuitry into a single integrated device. The sensor output is directly fed back to the driver through an internal feedback loop, eliminating the need for external microcontroller processing and reducing response time while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements an internal feedback loop where the magnetic field sensor output signal is directly related to the coil driver input. This closed-loop feedback mechanism continuously adjusts the drive current based on actual position feedback, improving control precision without requiring external processing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If closed-loop control is implemented using microcontroller with position sensor feedback, then control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functions (sensing, driving, and control) into a single integrated device. The magnetic field sensor, coil driver, and feedback circuit are combined, reducing the number of separate components and simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining precise control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated device performs multiple functions: the magnetic field sensor detects position, the coil driver provides drive current, and the internal feedback loop implements control. This multi-functional integration reduces system complexity by eliminating the need for separate microcontroller, sensor interface, and driver circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If internal sensor-to-driver feedback is implemented, then non-linearities and hysteresis are compensated, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation for non-linearitiesVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback circuit is integrated within the same device as the coil driver and magnetic field sensor. This internal integration allows for compensation of non-linearities and hysteresis without requiring external components, as the feedback signal is directly processed within the device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables faster response times and precise linear motion control by self-stabilizing the system and calibrating control to specific applications, such as camera lens focusing, reducing mechanical hysteresis and non-linearities, and improving power efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetic field sensor such as a Hall-Effect sensor may be used to sense motor position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall-Effect: Hall Effect

Implementation Method 2

a coil driver to drive a coil that, when driven, effects a linear movement by a motion device having a magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS9784594B2Hall-effect based linear motor controller
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS LLC
  • US9784594B2 patent drawing
  • US9784594B2 patent drawing
  • US9784594B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A linear motion control device for use in a linear control system is presented. The linear motion control device includes a coil driver to drive a coil that, when driven, effects a linear movement by a motion device having a magnet. The linear motion control device also includes a magnetic field sensor to detect a magnetic field associated with the linear movement and an interface to connect an output of the magnetic field sensor and an input of the coil driver to an external controller. The interface includes a feedback loop to relate the magnetic field sensor output signal to the coil driver input.