Hall Effect Sensor Pressure Detection in Electric Toothbrushes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power toothbrush pressure sensors inaccurately measure bristle pressure against teeth due to inclusion of loads from mouth tissues, leading to incorrect trigger points for excessive force indication, potentially causing harm or reducing effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

The use of two Hall effect sensor systems to provide direct force/displacement and dynamic force/phase shift information, processed by a microprocessor to adjust trigger points based on peak-to-peak values, distinguishing between bristle pressure and mouth tissue loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single pressure sensor is used to measure bristle force, then the device complexity is low, but the measurement precision is poor due to inclusion of mouth tissue loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebristle pressure measurement accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement is divided into two independent components: a first sensor measures dynamic force through phase shift analysis, while a second sensor measures static offset force. This segmentation allows each sensor to capture specific force components, improving overall measurement precision by separating bristle pressure from mouth tissue loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Phase shift analysis serves as an intermediary method to distinguish between dynamic bristle force and static mouth tissue load. By analyzing the phase relationship between drive signal and sensor output, the system can extract dynamic force information while filtering out static offsets, thereby improving measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If pressure sensor threshold is set high to avoid false warnings from mouth tissue loads, then false alarms are reduced, but harmful excessive pressure may not be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexcessive force indication accuracyVSAvoidundetected harmful pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides continuous feedback by monitoring both dynamic force (first sensor) and static offset force (second sensor) separately. By comparing both measurements against respective thresholds, the system can accurately determine when excessive bristle pressure is applied, providing reliable feedback to the user without false alarms or missed detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different threshold criteria to different force components: a first threshold for dynamic force and a second threshold for static offset force. This partial application of thresholding to specific force components allows accurate detection of harmful pressure while ignoring normal mouth tissue loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensor systems are used to differentiate force components, then the measurement precision improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce component differentiation accuracyVSAvoidsensor and processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single Hall effect sensor serves multiple functions: it measures both dynamic force (through phase shift analysis of the first sensor output) and static offset force (through the second sensor output). This multi-functionality reduces the need for completely separate sensor systems while maintaining measurement precision for different force components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical force decomposition mechanisms with electrical signal processing. By using phase shift analysis and digital signal processing on Hall effect sensor outputs, the system differentiates force components without requiring complex mechanical arrangements, thereby reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides more accurate and informed feedback to users about excessive pressure, ensuring effective cleaning without harm by differentiating between direct bristle pressure and mouth tissue loads, thus optimizing the cleaning experience.

Implementation Method 1

A Hall effect sensor or sensors 52, 53 is/are mounted within the power toothbrush 29... The Hall-effect sensors 52 can be mounted in various positions within the power toothbrush 29... The Hall-effect sensor recognizes the lateral displacement of the drive train due to force on the bristle field against the teeth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Implementation Method 2

A magnet 48... Mounted within the power toothbrush is a Hall-effect sensor or sensors 52, 53... The Hall-effect sensor recognizes the lateral displacement of the drive train due to force on the bristle field against the teeth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field generation through oscillation: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP2938288B1Pressure sensing electric toothbrush
Publication Date: 2018.11.21 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP2938288B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2938288B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2938288B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The toothbrush includes a sensor system for determining pressure on the teeth by a direct force measurement such as displacement, and a system for determining pressure on the teeth by a dynamic load measurement system, such as phase shift. These different pressure results are combined with peak-to-peak bristle motion values of Hall effect output values and compared to a table to obtain a more accurate value of bristle pressure against the teeth and to raise,lower or maintain the trigger threshold of excessive pressure accordingly.