Hall Sensor Deep Trench Isolation for JFET Effect Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Hall effect sensors experience instability and variations in magnetic gain and offset due to the JFET effect caused by common mode feedback regulation, which modulates the terminal voltages and affects the depletion regions, leading to temperature-dependent drift and manufacturing inconsistencies.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of deep trench isolation structures to isolate the p-type layer within the Hall element, ensuring that the p-type layer is coupled to the lowest potential terminal, thereby maintaining a constant depletion region depth and reducing variations in resistance and offset.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If common mode feedback regulation is used to stabilize the Hall voltage, then temperature-dependent drift is reduced, but the JFET effect causes variability in magnetic gain and offset

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature stabilityVSAvoidmagnetic gain consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the Hall element into distinct regions: an active region for Hall effect measurement and a separate p-type layer for potential control. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each region's function, preventing the p-type layer from interfering with the Hall voltage measurement while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and isolates the p-type layer from the active Hall measurement region by introducing deep trench isolation structures. This separation removes the source of the JFET effect (the p-type layer) from the active region, eliminating its harmful influence on magnetic gain and offset while preserving the common mode feedback regulation benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Device complexity

If the p-type layer is not isolated, then the Hall element structure is simple, but the depletion region depth varies causing offset drift

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidoffset stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a vertical dimension to the isolation structure by implementing deep trenches that extend through the substrate. This three-dimensional isolation approach effectively separates the p-type layer from the active region in the vertical direction, maintaining structural simplicity on the surface while achieving precise offset stability through deep isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If deep trench isolation is implemented to eliminate JFET effect, then magnetic gain variability is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic gain consistencyVSAvoidisolation structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing deep trench isolation only in specific locations where the p-type layer interfaces with the active region. Rather than isolating the entire structure, the trenches are strategically placed at critical interfaces, providing precise control where needed while maintaining simplicity elsewhere in the device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the variability in magnetic gain and offset by eliminating the JFET effect, providing stable performance across temperature and manufacturing variations.

Implementation Method 1

In the presence of a magnetic field orthogonal to the direction of current through Hall element 100, in this example into or out of the page of FIG. 1, the Lorentz force acts on the majority carriers in the semiconductor material of Hall element 100 (e.g., electrons in n-type silicon) to produce a 'Hall voltage,' namely the differential of voltages VH+ and VH− at terminals T2 and T4, respectively.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Implementation Method 2

This common mode feedback circuit includes amplifier 150, which receives a common mode reference voltage VCM generated by reference voltage circuit 152 at a negative input. Amplifier 150 is configured to produce an output signal corresponding to the difference between the common mode voltage of terminals T2 and T4 and common mode reference voltage VCM from reference voltage circuit 152. This output signal is applied as a control signal to current source 126 so that the common mode voltage at terminals T2 and T4 matches common mode reference voltage VCM, regardless of manufacturing and temperature variations in Hall effect sensor 110.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFeedback regulation: Feedback

Implementation Method 3

The implementation of deep trench isolation structures to isolate the p-type layer within the Hall element, ensuring that the p-type layer is coupled to the lowest potential terminal, thereby maintaining a constant depletion region depth and reducing variations in resistance and offset.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical isolation: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS20260072105A1Hall Effect Sensor with Reduced JFET Effect
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US20260072105A1 patent drawing
  • US20260072105A1 patent drawing
  • US20260072105A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A Hall effect sensor including a Hall element disposed at a surface of a semiconductor body, including a first doped region of a first conductivity type disposed over and abutted by an isolated second doped region of a second conductivity type. First through fourth terminals of the Hall element are in electrical contact with the first doped region, and a fifth terminal in electrical contact with the second doped region. A Hall effect sensor includes a first current source coupled to the first terminal of the Hall element, and common mode feedback regulation circuitry. The common mode feedback regulation circuitry has an output coupled to the third terminal and a ground node, and having an input coupled to the second and fourth terminals of the Hall element, and an output coupled to the third terminal and a ground node, where the second doped region is coupled to the third terminal.