Halogen-Free PVC Cable Separators for Aerospace Fire Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional fire retardant polymers for aerospace and plenum materials are costly, degrade mechanically and electrically, and pose health concerns due to additives, necessitating a cost-effective, halogen-free alternative that meets stringent fire certification standards.

Innovation Solution

A fire retardant composition comprising polyvinyl chloride (PVC), trimellitate ester or phosphate ester plasticizers, a brominated fire retardant additive, a metal hydroxide synergist, and a mixed metal stabilizer, which is free of halogenated plasticizers, enhancing mechanical and electrical properties while maintaining durability and flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fire retardant additives are used in polymers, then fire retardant performance is improved, but health concerns and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire retardant performanceVSAvoidhealth concerns
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes halogenated plasticizers from the composition entirely, extracting the harmful component while maintaining fire retardant performance through the synergistic combination of brominated fire retardant additive and metal hydroxide synergist. This extraction principle directly addresses the health concerns associated with traditional halogenated formulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the plasticizer from halogenated to non-halogenated types (trimellitate ester or phosphate ester), fundamentally altering the composition to eliminate harmful effects while preserving the desired fire retardant properties through adjusted additive ratios and synergistic interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional fire retardant polymers are used, then fire certification standards are met, but mechanical and electrical properties degrade

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire certification complianceVSAvoidmechanical and electrical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite formulation combining polyvinyl chloride with specific ratios of plasticizer (10-40 parts), brominated fire retardant additive (0.1-25 parts), metal hydroxide synergist (25-75 parts), and mixed metal stabilizer (1-10 parts). This composite approach achieves fire certification compliance while preserving mechanical and electrical properties through optimized material interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the compositional parameters by eliminating halogenated plasticizers and using specific ranges of non-halogenated alternatives combined with metal hydroxide synergists, which prevents the degradation of mechanical and electrical properties that occurs with traditional formulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If halogenated plasticizers are used, then cost is reduced, but fire retardant performance and health safety worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidfire retardant performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts halogenated plasticizers from the formulation and replaces them with non-halogenated alternatives, eliminating the cost advantage they provided while achieving superior fire retardant performance and health safety through the synergistic additive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent develops a composite material system using non-halogenated plasticizers combined with brominated fire retardant additives and metal hydroxide synergists in specific ratios, creating a cost-effective formulation that outperforms traditional halogenated plasticizers in fire retardant performance and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composition exhibits improved mechanical and electrical properties, passing stringent fire certification tests like NFPA 262 and UL 910, with reduced weight and crosstalk noise in cables, and is suitable for aerospace and cable applications.

Implementation Method 1

a fire retardant synergist including a metal hydroxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

a brominated fire retardant additive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChain reaction inhibition:

Data Source

PatentUS10246639B2Fire retardant compositions and cable separators formed thereof
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 GENERAL CABLE TECH CORP
  • US10246639B2 patent drawing
  • US10246639B2 patent drawing
  • US10246639B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fire retardant composition is disclosed. The composition includes polyvinyl chloride, a plasticizer, a brominated fire retardant additive, a fire retardant synergist, and a metal stabilizer. Cable separators formed of the fire retardant composition are also disclosed.