Halogen-Modified Activated Carbon for Mercury Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mercury control technologies face inefficiencies in removing mercury from flue gases with low-halogen species and high sulfur concentrations, and they often compromise the usability of fly ash for concrete production due to adsorption of air entraining agents.

Innovation Solution

Development of sorbent compositions comprising powdered activated carbon with halogen-containing and alkaline components, processed to finer particle sizes for enhanced mercury capture, and inclusion of sacrificial agents to minimize foaming index impacts on fly ash.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If powdered activated carbon is injected into flue gas to capture mercury, then mercury removal efficiency is improved, but the sorbent may oxidize and burn within injection lances at high temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury removal efficiencyVSAvoidcarbon particle oxidation and burning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a halogen-containing component as an intermediary substance that catalyzes mercury capture while protecting the carbon sorbent from direct oxidation. The halogen component facilitates mercury adsorption at lower temperatures, reducing the thermal stress on carbon particles during injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the operational temperature parameter by injecting activated carbon at lower temperatures (below 500°F) rather than high temperatures. This parameter change prevents carbon oxidation and burning while maintaining effective mercury capture through the halogen-enhanced adsorption mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If activated carbon is used to capture mercury in low-halogen flue gases, then mercury removal is achieved, but the capture efficiency decreases when flue gas halogen concentration is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury capture efficiencyVSAvoidperformance across varying flue gas compositions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-treating the activated carbon with halogen components before injection into the flue gas. This preliminary halogenation enhances the carbon's mercury capture capability, ensuring effective operation even when the flue gas itself has low halogen concentrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite sorbent material combining activated carbon with halogen-containing components. This composite structure provides both the adsorptive properties of carbon and the catalytic mercury-capturing ability of halogens, improving overall adaptability to different flue gas compositions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If activated carbon is injected at high temperatures to ensure good distribution, then sorbent distribution is improved, but the carbon particles oxidize and burn within the injection lances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorbent distributionVSAvoidcarbon particle oxidation and burning
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The halogen-containing component acts as an intermediary that enables effective sorbent distribution and mercury capture at lower temperatures. This intermediary mechanism eliminates the need for high-temperature injection, thereby preventing carbon oxidation while maintaining good sorbent distribution through alternative means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the temperature parameter from high (above 500°F) to low (below 500°F) injection conditions. This parameter change fundamentally alters the chemistry, preventing carbon oxidation while maintaining effective sorbent distribution through improved formulation and delivery methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If plain activated carbon is used in low-halogen flue gas environments, then the sorbent is simple and cost-effective, but mercury capture efficiency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorbent simplicity and costVSAvoidmercury capture efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a composite sorbent material that combines activated carbon with halogen-containing components in a cost-effective manner. This composite approach maintains the simplicity and low cost of using carbon-based materials while dramatically improving mercury capture efficiency through the synergistic halogen-carbon interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the chemical composition parameters of the sorbent by incorporating halogen elements into the activated carbon structure. This parameter change transforms plain activated carbon into an enhanced composite material that maintains cost-effectiveness while achieving superior mercury capture performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sorbent compositions achieve high mercury capture efficiency in diverse flue gas environments while maintaining fly ash usability for concrete production, reducing operational costs and improving sorbent delivery efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The injected powdered activated carbon particles capture mercury species from the flue gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

at least one alkaline component dispersed thereon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

inclusion of sacrificial agents to minimize foaming index impacts on fly ash

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS8080088B1Flue gas mercury control
Publication Date: 2011.12.20 SRINIVASACHAR SRIVATS
  • US8080088B1 patent drawing
  • US8080088B1 patent drawing
  • US8080088B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An adsorbent composition for removing mercury from a flue gas stream, and a method of its use. The composition is a powdered activated carbon having at least one of a halogen-containing component and an alkaline component dispersed thereon. A flow agent can be composited with the material to maintain flowability in situ.