Sensorized Hammer Testing for Non-Destructive Weld Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting welding faults in vehicle parts, such as visual inspection and cutting inspection, are inadequate as they either fail to identify depth or misalignment of welds or require destruction of parts for accurate sampling.

Innovation Solution

A fault detection apparatus utilizing a hammer device with a force sensor and vibration sensor, which applies an external force to the target part and calculates a frequency response function to determine if peak values are detected in predetermined regions, indicating a fault.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If visual inspection method is used, then total inspection can be performed, but welding depth and misalignment cannot be identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal inspection capabilityVSAvoidwelding depth and misalignment detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces visual inspection with a mechanical impact testing system that uses a hammer device to apply controlled forces and sensors to detect welding faults. The force sensor measures impact forces while the acceleration sensor detects vibrations, enabling detection of welding depth and misalignment issues that visual inspection cannot identify.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sensors (force sensor and acceleration sensor) as intermediaries between the hammer impact and the inspection system. These sensors mediate the detection process by converting mechanical impacts into measurable signals, allowing indirect detection of welding quality without direct visual observation of the weld interior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If cutting inspection method is used, then welding fault can be accurately determined, but parts must be destroyed and only sampling inspection can be performed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding fault detection accuracyVSAvoidtotal inspection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the destructive cutting inspection method with a non-destructive mechanical impact testing system. By using controlled hammer impacts and sensor measurements, the system can accurately detect welding faults without destroying the part, enabling total inspection of all components rather than sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The hammer device applies self-generated controlled impacts to the workpiece, and the workpiece itself serves as the test object. The system uses the workpiece's own structural response to impacts to reveal welding faults, eliminating the need for external destructive testing procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If hammer device with elastic body is used, then vibration can be absorbed, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration absorptionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an elastic body as a flexible element in the hammer device structure. This elastic body absorbs vibrations generated during impact operations, stabilizing the system by reducing unwanted vibrations while adding only minimal structural complexity compared to rigid alternatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate total inspection of welding faults without destroying the parts, allowing for quick identification of faulty components by comparing frequency response functions with those of good products.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic body provided on the upper body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The support may be formed of an elastic material to absorb vibration of the hammer and the elastic body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS12280451B2Hammer device, apparatus for detecting fault of welded part, and method using the same
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12280451B2 patent drawing
  • US12280451B2 patent drawing
  • US12280451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment hammer device includes a driver, an upper body configured to move in a direction set by power generated from the driver, an elastic body provided on the upper body, a hammer provided in the elastic body, a force sensor provided in the hammer, and a support configured to support the elastic body and the hammer.