HAMR Head Sorting by Reader Writer Widths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) devices face reliability challenges due to varying write power on hours (WPOH) across different capacity drives, with smaller capacity drives experiencing higher WPOH per head and larger capacity drives experiencing lower WPOH per head, leading to inconsistent head life and reliability.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves measuring and sorting HAMR read/write heads based on their reader and writer widths, with heads having higher predicted life used in drives with fewer heads and those with lower predicted life used in drives with more heads, thereby optimizing head usage and reliability across different capacity drives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If HAMR read/write heads are used across different capacity drives without sorting, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but head reliability varies inconsistently due to different write power on hours per head

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead reliabilityVSAvoidhead sorting process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by measuring and sorting HAMR heads based on reader and writer widths before drive assembly. This pre-sorting ensures that heads with similar durability characteristics are grouped together and assigned to appropriate drive capacity categories, eliminating reliability variations that would otherwise occur during operation. The sorting is performed in advance using width measurements as a proxy for head life prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If heads are sorted by predicted life based on width measurements, then head reliability is improved across different drive capacities, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter used for head classification from operational characteristics to physical dimensions. By measuring reader and writer widths—static geometric parameters—the system predicts head life and determines appropriate drive assignments without requiring complex operational testing. This parameter transformation simplifies the manufacturing process while maintaining reliability improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If heads with higher predicted life are used in drives with fewer heads, then drive reliability is optimized, but head allocation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive reliabilityVSAvoidhead allocation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by matching specific head characteristics (predicted life based on width measurements) to specific drive requirements (number of heads per drive). Heads with higher predicted life are locally optimized for use in drives with fewer heads where each head experiences higher write power on hours, while heads with lower predicted life are assigned to drives with more heads. This localized matching optimizes overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9704519B1Sorting of HAMR read/write heads based on reader and writer widths
Publication Date: 2017.07.11 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US9704519B1 patent drawing
  • US9704519B1 patent drawing
  • US9704519B1 patent drawing

AI summary

For each head in a collection of heat-assisted magnetic recording read/write heads, a reader width and a writer width is measured. A predicted life is determined for each head based on the respective reader width and writer width. In a first set of drives having relatively fewer heads per drive, a first subset of the heads having a higher value of the predicted life are used. In a second set of drives having relatively more heads per drive, a second subset of the heads having a lower value of the predicted life are used.