Interleaved Laser Current Calibration for HAMR Heads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional laser calibration techniques for heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) heads are time-consuming and cannot be used during normal service due to time and customer constraints, as they involve writing individual tracks with single operational currents and analyzing bit error rate (BER) for each, which is impractical for field use.

Innovation Solution

The method involves interleaving the laser current throughout a revolution of the magnetic recording medium to average out variations in write performance metrics, reducing the time required for calibration by writing sectors using different operational currents and calculating the best average write performance metric.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional laser calibration techniques are used (writing individual tracks with single operational currents and analyzing BER for each), then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit error rate measurement precisionVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration process is segmented by dividing the magnetic recording medium into multiple sector groups distributed around the circumference, with each sector group containing multiple sectors. Different operational currents are applied to different sectors within each sector group, allowing parallel calibration measurements across multiple sectors simultaneously rather than sequentially writing individual tracks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple calibration measurements using different operational currents are merged into a single calibration pass by interleaving the currents across different sectors. The controller combines the BER measurements from all sectors into a single average write performance metric, enabling comprehensive calibration data collection in one operation rather than requiring separate track writings for each current level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple different operational currents are tested to find the optimal current, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases due to time constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaser operational current optimizationVSAvoidcalibration throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration process maintains continuous useful action by interleaving multiple operational currents across different sectors within the same rotation of the magnetic recording medium. This allows the calibration to proceed continuously in a single pass without stopping to rewrite tracks or perform separate measurements for each current level, thereby maintaining high productivity while still testing multiple current values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-configuring the sector groups and interleaving pattern before the calibration run. The controller is pre-programmed with the sector group assignments and current interleaving sequence, allowing the calibration to execute efficiently without real-time decision-making delays, thus improving both precision and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If calibration is performed during normal service to improve reliability, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to service interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaser calibration accuracyVSAvoidservice time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration process uses periodic action by implementing a repeating interleaved current pattern across sector groups that completes within a single or few rotations of the magnetic recording medium. This periodic structure allows calibration to be performed rapidly during normal service operations without causing significant interruptions, as the calibration cycle repeats efficiently and can be completed between customer-access intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the time needed for laser calibration, achieving a tighter distribution of bit error rate (BER) around the medium, improving calibration efficiency and accuracy, and allowing for faster identification of the optimal operational current.

Implementation Method 1

heat-assisted magnetic recording head... laser diode of the head... different operational currents supplied to the laser diode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10083716B1Laser calibration for heat-assisted magnetic recording head using interleaved laser current
Publication Date: 2018.09.25 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US10083716B1 patent drawing
  • US10083716B1 patent drawing
  • US10083716B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A heat-assisted magnetic recording head is moved relative to a magnetic recording medium. The medium comprises a plurality of sectors. The sectors define a plurality of sector groups distributed around a circumference of the medium. The sectors of each sector group are written using different operational currents supplied to a laser diode of the head such that at least one sector from each sector group is written using one of the different operational currents. For each of the different operational currents, an average write performance metric is calculated for all sectors written at each of the different operational currents. A particular operational current of the different operational currents is determined that results in a best average write performance metric.