Hand Biometric Anti-Spoofing via Dynamic Configuration Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Biometric recognition systems are vulnerable to counterfeit biometrics, such as photographs or 3D fake body parts, which can fool the system into providing unauthorized access.

Innovation Solution

A method using hand biometrics that involves acquiring multiple images of a hand in different configurations, such as rotating or flexing, to determine if the hand is real and alive by comparing geometric and appearance measurements, and using anti-spoofing measures like three-dimensional geometry and skin pixel deformation analysis to verify identity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional biometric recognition systems are used, then identification and verification can be performed conveniently, but the system becomes vulnerable to counterfeit biometrics such as photographs or 3D fake body parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience of biometric verificationVSAvoidsecurity against spoofing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures multiple images of the hand in different configurations (different positions, orientations, or deformations) and analyzes the dynamic changes between these configurations. By requiring the hand to move or change shape, the system ensures the biometric sample is from a living, flexible object rather than a static counterfeit, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of use and security against spoofing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic capture of hand images in multiple configurations, requiring the user to perform repeated actions (such as moving the hand through different positions or making specific gestures). This periodic verification process ensures the biometric sample is from a living subject capable of movement, thereby enhancing security while maintaining user convenience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If multiple images in different configurations are acquired and analyzed, then spoofing detection is enhanced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-spoofing capabilityVSAvoidcomplexity of image acquisition and analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a single imaging device that performs multiple functions: capturing images in different configurations, analyzing geometric relationships, detecting spoofing attempts, and verifying identity. By making the imaging device multi-functional, the system enhances anti-spoofing capability without proportionally increasing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the hand itself as both the biometric source and the verification mechanism. The geometric relationships and deformation characteristics of the hand in different configurations provide inherent verification data, eliminating the need for additional complex verification devices or mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7983451B2Recognition method using hand biometrics with anti-counterfeiting
Publication Date: 2011.07.19 GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
  • US7983451B2 patent drawing
  • US7983451B2 patent drawing
  • US7983451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for identifying and verifying a person using hand biometrics with an anti-spoofing measure. The method comprises acquiring (51) a first image (10) of a hand in a first configuration, acquiring (52) a second image (30, 40) of the hand in one of the first and a second configuration for comparison with the first image (10), determining (52) whether a person can be identified from at least one of the first image (10) and the second image (30, 40), and determining (55) from a comparison of the second image (30, 40) with the first image (10) whether the hand is a counterfeit.