Hand-Drawn Image Exaggeration and Reduction for Pictograph Clarity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for creating pictographic images using a limited number of dots are time-consuming and difficult to produce balanced, well-defined images, often resulting in visibility degradation during reduction, with lines becoming indistinct and inconsistent image sizes in e-mail documents.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus and method that includes an exaggeration unit to expand hand-drawn elements and a reduction unit to generate a reduced image of a predetermined size, preventing line loss and ensuring consistent image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a simple reduction process is performed on a large original image to create a small pictographic image, then the image size is reduced to fit display requirements, but the reduced image becomes indistinct with lines dropping out and visibility degrading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage sizeVSAvoidline definition
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing the exaggeration process before the reduction process. The hand-drawn elements are expanded in advance to ensure they maintain sufficient thickness and visibility even after subsequent reduction to the target small size (e.g., 20x20 dots). This pre-expansion compensates for the upcoming size reduction and prevents line dropout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of line thickness by applying an exaggeration process that specifically increases the thickness of hand-drawn elements. This parameter change ensures that when the image is reduced, the lines remain visible and distinct rather than becoming too thin to detect in the reduced pictographic image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If individual cell operations are performed to create a pictographic image with a limited number of dots, then the image can be created with precise control over each dot, but the creation process becomes extremely time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedot placement precisionVSAvoidimage creation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copying by taking an original hand-drawn image and creating a reduced version through automated processing rather than manually recreating each dot. The system copies the essential features of the original drawing and reproduces them in the reduced pictographic format, dramatically reducing creation time while maintaining recognizability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual operation of setting each individual dot with an automated image processing system. The computer-executed program automatically performs exaggeration and reduction operations, substituting manual cell-by-cell work with automated mechanical processing that is both faster and more consistent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If hand-drawn images are written directly to an e-mail document without reduction, then the images maintain their original quality, but the text and images are displayed in uneven sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidsize consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically adjusting the size parameter of hand-drawn images through an automated reduction process. The system transforms images of various original sizes into a unified reduced format (e.g., 20x20 dots), ensuring consistent display dimensions while preserving essential visual characteristics through the exaggeration-preparation step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10192285B2Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and computer-readable recording medium
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 RICOH CO LTD
  • US10192285B2 patent drawing
  • US10192285B2 patent drawing
  • US10192285B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus includes an exaggeration unit configured to perform on an original image including a hand-drawn element an exaggeration process that expands the hand-drawn element to generate an exaggerated image; and a reduction unit configured to reduce the exaggerated image to generate a reduced image of a predetermined size smaller than a size of the original image.