Lightweight Hand Exoskeleton Force Feedback via Multi-Axis Links

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional finger force feedback exoskeleton devices are heavy, complex, and uncomfortable to wear, often causing harm due to their inability to adapt to the multi-axis rotation of human index finger bones, and lack closed-loop control for effective force feedback.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight hand exoskeleton force feedback apparatus with a simple structure, incorporating a pressure sensor for closed-loop control, which includes a driver, rotating links, linkage links, and bearings to mimic the multi-axis rotation of the human index finger, providing comfortable and effective force feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional finger force feedback exoskeleton devices are used, then force feedback function is provided, but the device becomes heavy and complex, causing discomfort and harm to wearers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce feedback functionVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The exoskeleton device is divided into multiple independent modules: a driver module with motor, a transmission module with gear mechanism, and a finger support module with rotating links. Each module performs a specific function, allowing the system to provide force feedback while keeping individual components lightweight and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs dynamic rotating links that can change their rotation axes during operation. The first rotating link rotates around a first axis, while the second rotating link rotates around a second axis that differs from the first, enabling the mechanism to adapt to the multi-axis rotation characteristics of human finger bones and reduce mechanical interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If traditional fixed-axis rotation design is used, then structure is simplified, but the device cannot adapt to multi-axis rotation of human index finger bones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation mechanismVSAvoidadaptation to finger rotation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device employs dynamic rotating links that can change their rotation axes during operation. The first rotating link rotates around a first axis, while the second rotating link rotates around a second axis that differs from the first, enabling the mechanism to adapt to the multi-axis rotation characteristics of human finger bones and reduce mechanical interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The rotation axis parameters of the rotating links are designed to change during operation. The first rotating link has a rotation axis that differs from the second rotating link's axis, allowing the mechanism to accommodate the natural multi-axis rotation of finger bones during grasping and releasing actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If traditional open-loop control is used, then control system is simple, but closed-loop control over driver output is lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol systemVSAvoidforce feedback control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device incorporates a force feedback mechanism where the driver generates rotational force that is transmitted through rotating links to the finger support. The system provides closed-loop control by monitoring the force applied and adjusting the driver output accordingly, ensuring accurate force feedback while maintaining comfort and safety for the wearer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus provides high-efficiency fingertip force feedback that conforms to the multi-axis rotation of the human index finger, is comfortable to wear for long periods, and achieves accurate closed-loop control of force feedback, enhancing user experience and safety.

Implementation Method 1

a pressure is accordingly imposed on a pressure sensor of the pressure sensor fixing member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS12271523B2Lightweight hand exoskeleton force feedback apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 SOUTHEAST UNIV
  • US12271523B2 patent drawing
  • US12271523B2 patent drawing
  • US12271523B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a lightweight hand exoskeleton force feedback apparatus, including a driver, a first rotating link, a second rotating link, a first linkage link, a second linkage link, a finger sleeve, and a pressure sensor fixing member; the driver is worn on a back of metacarpal bone of a human hand, the finger sleeve is fixed on an index finger, and the pressure sensor fixing member is fixed below the index finger; when the human hand bends to simulate a state of grasping an object, the driver drives the first rotating link to couple with the first linkage link and the second linkage link through the second rotating link to drive the finger sleeve to bend and stretch, force feedback is applied to the fingertip, and a pressure is accordingly imposed on a pressure sensor of the pressure sensor fixing member, so that closed-loop force feedback control is implemented.