Hand Lever Locking System with Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locking systems for windows and doors are not easy to operate or set up, lacking a simple and effective mechanism to prevent unauthorized handling and ensure secure, time-controlled operation.

Innovation Solution

A control device connected to a sensor unit and transmitter device allows data transmission and receipt of activation/deactivation commands, using a displaceable locking sleeve and actuator to interact between the handle part and fastening device, with a button for manual actuation and a method for secure communication with a control center to manage locking states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a traditional locking system is used, then security is provided, but ease of operation deteriorates due to complex mechanisms and installation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is divided into modular components: a locking sleeve with locking elements, a separate actuator mechanism, and a control unit. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while simplifying overall operation and installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical locking mechanisms with an electromechanical system. The actuator (electric motor or solenoid) substitutes for manual manipulation of complex mechanical parts, and the control unit replaces mechanical key-based authorization systems with electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If a secure locking mechanism is implemented, then unauthorized handling is prevented, but ease of installation deteriorates due to complex setup requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidease of installation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The locking sleeve is designed as a universal component that can be integrated into different window and door fitting types (tilt-and-turn, casement, etc.). The standardized interface and modular design enable easy installation across various applications without requiring custom mechanisms for each fitting type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit serves as an intermediary between the security authorization system and the physical locking mechanism. It handles the complex authorization logic, communication with control centers, and security protocols, while presenting a simple interface to the actuator and locking sleeve, thereby simplifying installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If manual operation is allowed, then usability is improved, but security deteriorates due to potential unauthorized operation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveusabilityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system dynamically adjusts its state based on authorization status. The locking elements can be engaged or disengaged by the actuator based on real-time authorization signals from the control unit, which receives commands from control centers or local authorization inputs. This dynamic control allows manual operation only when authorized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit implements feedback mechanisms by receiving status information from sensors (e.g., window open/closed position) and sending authorization commands to the actuator. The system continuously monitors the state and adjusts locking status accordingly, ensuring security while allowing appropriate manual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If automatic relocking is implemented, then security is enhanced, but loss of time occurs due to definable time intervals

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidtime interval
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit is programmed to automatically re-engage the locking mechanism after a defined time interval following authorization. This periodic relocking action ensures that even if the window or door is left unattended, security is restored after the interval expires, balancing security enhancement with minimal user inconvenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3604719B1Hand lever
Publication Date: 2022.03.16 SIEGENIA AUBI KG
  • EP3604719B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3604719B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3604719B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The application relates to a hand lever (1) for a window or door, wherein the hand lever (1) comprises a rotatably mounted handle part (2) and a fastening device (3) on the sash or frame, the handle part (2) is couplingable with a drive rod, a locking device effective between the handle part (2) and the fastening device (3) is provided, wherein the locking device, in the activated state, prevents a rotational movement of the handle part (2) relative to the fastening device (3), the locking device has an actuator (11) that can be activated by means of electrical energy, and the locking device is connected to a control device (13), wherein the control device (13) comprises a transmitter/receiver which communicates with a possible control center, wherein the control center communicates with each control device (13).In order to obtain an easy-to-use and easy-to-install locking system, it is provided that the control device (13) is connected to sensors (17), and wherein the transmitter device allows the transmission of the data from the sensors (17), and enables the reception of activation and deactivation commands for the actuator (11) of the control device (13), and at least one sensor (17) determines the rotational position of the handle part (2) relative to the fastening device (3).