Hand Tool Blocking Device for Eccentric Spindle Play

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hand-held power tools with eccentric grinding or polishing functions face challenges in securely holding the tool spindle in place during tool changes due to excessive play, especially when using tools with threads or bayonets, which complicates the mounting and dismounting process.

Innovation Solution

A blocking device is implemented with sequential engagement of locking projections and receptacles on a locking device and a blocking part, allowing for precise alignment and secure locking of the tool spindle, even with eccentric movements, using a combination of first and second blocking arrangements that engage in a specific order to minimize play and ensure tool spindle stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single locking device is used to block the tool spindle, then the structure is simple, but the tool spindle has excessive play and cannot be securely held

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure holding of tool spindleVSAvoidblocking device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blocking device is segmented into multiple locking arrangements (first and second locking arrangements with respective locking projections and receptacles). Each locking arrangement independently contributes to securing the tool spindle, reducing total play through cumulative constraint. This segmentation allows the system to achieve higher reliability without requiring a single overly complex locking mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the blocking part is made stationary relative to the housing, then the structure is simple, but the tool spindle cannot accommodate eccentric movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of eccentric movementsVSAvoidblocking device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blocking part is designed to be movable relative to the housing, capable of executing eccentric movements that follow the tool spindle's motion. This dynamic design allows the blocking part to maintain proper engagement with the locking device while accommodating the eccentricity of the tool spindle, preventing binding and ensuring smooth operation throughout the eccentric cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the locking device is made linearly adjustable, then the sequential engagement of blocking arrangements is enabled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesequential engagement processVSAvoidlocking device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking device is designed with linear adjustability that enables preliminary positioning for sequential engagement. The first locking arrangement engages first to establish an initial stable connection, then the locking device can be further adjusted to enable engagement of the second locking arrangement. This preliminary action approach simplifies the overall engagement process by breaking it into manageable sequential steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP1923172B1Hand tool with a blocking device
Publication Date: 2009.07.15 FESTOOL GMBH
  • EP1923172B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1923172B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1923172B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3c

AI summary

A manual machine tool has a motor (11) for driving a machine tool spindle (12) and is interlocked in an interlock position, where with movement of the retainer device (76) in the interlock position, a first interlock salience (80) and a first interlock location (79) engage a first interlock arrangement (78). The first interlock salience (80) and the first interlock location (79) mutually engage and remain in engagement, when a second interlock salience (83) and second interlock part engage a second interlock arrangement (81).