Hand Tool Double Compound Leverage Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing one-hand hand tools with simple or compound leverage are insufficient for tasks requiring significant mechanical advantage, such as cutting, crimping, or seaming thicker materials over extended periods, as they demand more hand pressure than a user can provide.

Innovation Solution

A hand tool design with six members connected at seven pivot points, incorporating additional center members to doubly compound the leverage between jaw and handle members, increasing mechanical advantage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If simple leverage or compound leverage is used in one-hand tools, then the tool can be operated with one hand, but the mechanical advantage is insufficient for cutting, crimping, or seaming thicker materials over extended periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveone-hand operationVSAvoidmechanical advantage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The tool is divided into six distinct members (first jaw member, second jaw member, first center member, second center member, first handle member, second handle member) connected through seven pivot points. This segmentation creates a double compound leverage system where the first set of pivots (P1, P2, P3) provides initial mechanical advantage, and the second set of pivots (P4, P5, P6) compounds this advantage further, achieving approximately 64:1 mechanical advantage while maintaining one-hand operation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Force

If more hand pressure is applied to increase mechanical advantage, then thicker materials can be cut, crimped, or seamed, but the user cannot sustain this pressure over protracted periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand pressureVSAvoidduration of work period
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The center members (first center member C1 and second center member C2) act as intermediary elements between the jaw members and handle members. These intermediaries create additional leverage points that multiply the user's input force, reducing the direct hand pressure required while maintaining sufficient cutting, crimping, or seaming force on the material over extended work periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Force

If additional pivots and center members are added to increase mechanical advantage, then the tool can handle thicker materials with less hand pressure, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical advantageVSAvoidnumber of members and pivots
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the jaw members and handle members through center members that serve dual functions. The first center member C1 connects both the first jaw member J1 and first handle member H1 to the second center member C2, which similarly connects the second jaw member J2 and second handle member H2. This merging approach achieves double compound leverage with six members and seven pivots, which is more efficient than conventional designs that would require even more components to achieve similar mechanical advantage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The enhanced mechanical advantage allows for easier operation with one hand, enabling tasks like cutting, seaming, or crimping thicker materials over longer periods with reduced hand pressure.

Implementation Method 1

The tool provides double compound leverage because it has four sets of levers. Lever arm A is the distance between the crotch of first jaw member J1 and pivot P1. Lever arm B is the distance between pivot P1 and pivot P2. Lever arm C is the distance between pivot P2 and pivot P4. Lever arm D is the distance between pivot P2 and the distal end of first handle member H1.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLever: Lever

Implementation Method 2

Therefore the mechanical advantage MA of hand tool 500 is MA=(B/A)×(D/C). In the typical hand tool 500 shown, the length of the lever arms are about: A=0.5 inches, B=1.25 inches, C=0.8 inches, and D=5.25 inches. The mechanical advantage MA is therefore MA=(1.25/0.5)×(5.25/0.8)=about 16.4 which is generally referred to as 16.4 to 1.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS7444851B1Hand tool providing double compound leverage to the jaws
Publication Date: 2008.11.04 JANSON PAUL M
  • US7444851B1 patent drawing
  • US7444851B1 patent drawing
  • US7444851B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A hand tool for use by one hand provides double compound leverage of the force exerted on the handles to the jaws. This is achieved by adding additional pivots and lever arms between the handles and the jaws. The jaws may take the form of a sheet metal snip, seamer, or crimper.