Security device for functional display and security of handheld electronic devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security measures for handheld electronic devices, such as alarm sensors attached with adhesive, often fail to prevent theft due to false alarms and limited coverage, leading to retailers ignoring alarms and increased vulnerability to theft.

Innovation Solution

A security device with sliding arms and a leveling plate that securely holds the device, allowing for adjustable retention and integration of an alarm sensor to prevent tampering, while enabling functional display and inspection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If alarm sensors are attached to handheld electronic devices using adhesive, then security monitoring is enabled, but the adhesive often fails causing false alarms and loss of contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm sensor contact reliabilityVSAvoidcustomer inspection accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The security device is divided into separate components: a base unit and multiple detachable alarm sensors. Each sensor can be independently attached to different locations on the device, allowing reliable security monitoring while enabling easy removal and repositioning for customer inspection without adhesive failure issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The alarm sensors are designed to be dynamically repositionable rather than fixed. The sensors can be moved between different locations on the handheld device and easily attached/detached as needed, providing both reliable security coverage and flexibility for customer access during inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multiple alarm sensors are installed in multiple locations on the device, then theft prevention coverage is improved, but customer inspection is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft prevention coverageVSAvoidcustomer inspection ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple alarm sensors are segmented into separate, independently positionable units rather than being permanently fixed. This allows the sensors to be strategically placed in multiple locations for comprehensive theft prevention while enabling customers to easily move them aside or remove them for full inspection access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The alarm sensors act as temporary intermediaries during display rather than permanent obstacles. They can be easily removed or repositioned to allow customer inspection, then reinstated for security, serving as a flexible mediator between security requirements and customer access needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If alarm sensors are attached firmly to the device, then security monitoring reliability is improved, but false alarms increase due to adhesive failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidfalse alarm frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment mechanism is made dynamic rather than static. The alarm sensors can be firmly attached when needed for reliable security monitoring and easily removed or repositioned to prevent adhesive failure and false alarms. This dynamic attachment eliminates the harmful effect of adhesive degradation over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The security device performs self-adjustment through easy repositioning of the alarm sensors. When adhesive shows signs of failure or false alarms occur, the sensors can be quickly removed and reattached to fresh surfaces, allowing the system to self-correct without professional intervention and maintain reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of manufacture

If adhesive is used to attach alarm sensors, then installation simplicity is improved, but contact stability deteriorates over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidsensor contact stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment system is segmented into reusable components rather than relying on permanent adhesive bonding. Each alarm sensor can be independently attached and detached, maintaining installation simplicity while eliminating the stability deterioration problem caused by adhesive aging and failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The alarm sensors are designed as disposable or easily replaceable components rather than permanent installations. When attachment stability deteriorates, the sensors can be quickly replaced without complex tools or procedures, maintaining both installation simplicity and contact stability over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS10925414B2Security device for functional display and security of handheld electronic devices
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 SCORPION SECURITY PRODUCTS INC
  • US10925414B2 patent drawing
  • US10925414B2 patent drawing
  • US10925414B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A security device and base for a mobile device. The security device includes a body, at least two sliding arms coupled to the body, and a leveling plate coupled to the body and configured to receive the mobile device.