Handle and container with handle

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional slow cookers lack a means to support a lid after it is removed, are often aesthetically unpleasing, difficult to use, and require two hands to carry due to side handles, making them inconvenient for single-handed use.

Innovation Solution

A handle with a receiving area and locking mechanism that can securely hold a slow cooker lid, allowing for single-handed carrying and supporting the lid when not in use, which can be integrated into new slow cookers or provided as a retrofit for existing ones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional slow cookers use side handles for carrying, then the container can be carried, but it requires two hands and reduces ease of operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of carryingVSAvoidhandle configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the carrying handle function with the lid support function into a single integrated structure. The handle is positioned to span across the container opening, allowing it to serve both as a gripping point for carrying and as a support surface for the lid when removed, thereby eliminating the need for separate side handles and enabling single-handed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The handle structure is designed to perform multiple functions: it serves as a carrying handle for transporting the container, as a support structure for holding the lid when not in use, and potentially as a mounting point for locks. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by reducing the number of separate components needed while improving operational convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If conventional slow cookers lack a lid support structure, then the device is simpler, but the lid has no place to rest and reduces ease of operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelid managementVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lid support function is merged into the handle structure itself. The handle extends across the container opening in a position that naturally serves as a resting place for the lid, eliminating the need for separate lid support arms or clips while providing convenient lid management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The handle is designed as a multi-functional component that simultaneously provides carrying capability and lid support. By positioning the handle to span the container opening, it creates a natural ledge for the lid to rest on, thereby improving lid management without adding separate structural elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If conventional slow cookers use clips to secure the lid, then the lid can be held in place, but the structure becomes more complex and may be difficult to use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelid securingVSAvoidlid attachment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is integrated into the handle structure rather than being separate clips attached to the container body. The handle itself incorporates the locking function, allowing the lid to be secured through the handle assembly, which simplifies the overall structure and improves ease of operation while maintaining reliable lid securing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If conventional slow cookers have separate carrying handles and lid support structures, then each function is dedicated, but the overall device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidoverall structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functions (carrying, lid support, and potentially lid securing) into a single integrated handle structure. This handle spans the container opening and provides all these functions simultaneously, thereby reducing overall structural complexity while maintaining functional versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The handle is designed as a universal component that performs multiple functions: it serves as a carrying handle, a lid support structure, and a potential locking mechanism. This multi-functionality allows the device to maintain adaptability and versatility while reducing the number of separate components and overall structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10398258B2Handle and container with handle
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 BERANEK GERALD
  • US10398258B2 patent drawing
  • US10398258B2 patent drawing
  • US10398258B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example embodiments relate to a handle. In example embodiments, the handle may be attached to a container, for example, a slow cooker. In example embodiments the handle may be used to transport the container and may also be used to secure a lid to the container. In example embodiments, the handle may also be configured to receive and support the lid.