Handle Assembly Upgrade to Electronic Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical locking systems in data centre cabinets require costly and labour-intensive conversion to electronic locking systems, involving the removal and reinstallation of handles and locking mechanisms, which is inefficient and disrupts the cabinet's security setup.

Innovation Solution

A handle assembly that allows for the upgrade from mechanical to electronic locking without removing the handle from the door, by replacing the first housing with a second housing associated with electronic actuating means, utilizing shape memory alloy materials and a control panel for centralized control, and incorporating a mechanical lock for backup in case of power failure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If mechanical locking systems are converted to electronic locking systems by removing and reinstallating handles and locking mechanisms, then electronic locking functionality is achieved, but installation time and labor costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectronic locking functionalityVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is divided into separate functional modules: an electronic lock unit and a handle unit that can be independently installed and replaced. This segmentation allows the electronic lock to be upgraded without removing the handle, significantly reducing installation time while achieving electronic locking functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The handle assembly is designed to accommodate both mechanical and electronic locking mechanisms through a universal mounting interface. The handle body includes a receptacle that can receive either a mechanical lock or an electronic lock unit, enabling the same handle to support multiple locking types without replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If mechanical locking systems are converted to electronic locking systems by dismantling and reinstallation, then electronic locking functionality is achieved, but labor costs and disruption to security setup increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectronic locking functionalityVSAvoidconversion complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the locking mechanism from the handle, allowing the electronic lock unit to be independently installed into the handle's receptacle. This eliminates the need to dismantle the entire handle assembly or reconfigure mounting structures, greatly simplifying the conversion process and reducing labor costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The handle is pre-designed with a receptacle and mounting structure that anticipates both mechanical and electronic lock installations. This preliminary preparation of the handle body with compatible interfaces means that when conversion is needed, the electronic lock can be directly installed without any modification to the handle or door structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If a handle assembly is designed to accommodate both mechanical and electronic locks through replaceable housings, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking system compatibilityVSAvoidhandle assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The handle assembly is segmented into the handle body (with receptacle) and interchangeable lock units. This segmentation allows different lock types to be housed in separate modular units that fit into the same receptacle, maintaining external simplicity while enabling internal adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The handle body is designed as a universal platform with a standardized receptacle that can accommodate both mechanical and electronic lock units. This universal design consolidates multiple functions into a single handle structure, reducing overall system complexity despite supporting multiple locking types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates a cost-effective and labour-efficient upgrade to electronic locking with minimal disruption to the door's security setup, enabling secure access control and reducing installation time and costs.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing shape memory alloy materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShape memory alloy: Shape Memory Alloy

Data Source

PatentEP2923018B1Handle assembly
Publication Date: 2020.07.22 TELEZYGOLOGY INC
  • EP2923018B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2923018B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2923018B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention is useful for upgrading a mechanical handle assembly to an electronic handle assembly without the need to remove the handle from the door or the like to which the handle is attached. The handle assembly (100) is of the type which is mountable to a surface of a door. Handle (18') is moveable between a locked position and an unlocked position. A first housing useful for a mechanical locking handle is replaceable by a second housing (80) during conversion of the handle assembly from a mechanical version to an electronic version. Handle (18') is received at least partially within the housing (80) and is substantially within housing (80) in the locked position. In the unlocked position, handle (18') protrudes from the housing (80) and can be cause to swing sideways. Opening of the door when handle (18') is in the locked position is prevented by a lock (24'). When converted to the electronic version, lock (24') may remain but is capable of being unlocked by electronic actuation means (44, 78, 82).