Material Handling Control System for Dynamic Task Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current material handling automation systems face inefficiencies in task prioritization and execution, leading to increased idle time and processing delays, as they lack the ability to dynamically assess and reorganize task priorities in real-time.

Innovation Solution

The method involves controlling automatic mechanical material handling equipment to perform tasks with the highest priority while simultaneously evaluating and assigning higher priority to intermediate tasks necessary for subsequent tasks, allowing for parallel execution and reducing idle time by anticipating and reorganizing task priorities proactively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the system executes tasks in strict priority order without parallel evaluation, then task execution accuracy is improved, but idle time and processing delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidle timeVSAvoidtask execution accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary evaluation of intermediate tasks in parallel with current task execution. By assessing whether intermediate tasks need to be performed before the currently executed task completes, the system prepares task priority reorganization in advance, reducing idle time while maintaining execution accuracy through controlled sequential implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically reorganizes task priorities based on real-time evaluation results. When an intermediate task is identified as necessary, the system adjusts the execution sequence by assigning higher priority to the intermediate task, creating a flexible dynamic scheduling mechanism that optimizes both time utilization and execution reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the system evaluates and reorganizes task priorities in real-time, then productivity is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial handling efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system autonomously evaluates storage system data and determines whether intermediate tasks are required without external intervention. The system self-manages the priority reorganization process by automatically comparing task dependencies with current execution status, reducing the need for complex external control mechanisms while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation process operates continuously in parallel with task execution rather than interrupting the workflow. By maintaining continuous monitoring and evaluation without stopping material handling operations, the system achieves real-time optimization while avoiding the complexity of frequent system halts and restarts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Loss of time

If intermediate tasks are identified and prioritized in parallel with task execution, then loss of time is reduced, but measurement and detection difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing delaysVSAvoidtask dependency evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors storage system data and provides feedback on task execution status and intermediate task requirements. This feedback mechanism enables the system to detect whether intermediate tasks are needed by comparing current system state with task dependencies, reducing processing delays while managing detection complexity through systematic information flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9536767B1Material handling method
Publication Date: 2017.01.03 SAP SE
  • US9536767B1 patent drawing
  • US9536767B1 patent drawing
  • US9536767B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a material handling method of performing by means of an automatic mechanical material handling equipment controlled by a control system at least a first and a second access task for accessing respectively at least a first and at least a second article stored in a material handling storage system, the first and second access tasks having been assigned a first and a second execution priority respectively. The method comprises a) controlling the automatic mechanical material handling equipment to perform the first access task having the highest priority; and in parallel to performing the first access task a1) evaluating data indicative of the material handling storage system for determining that a first intermediate task is to be performed, wherein the first intermediate task is required in order to perform by the automatic mechanical material handling equipment the second access task; and a2) assigning an execution priority to the first intermediate task higher than the second execution priority; b) controlling the automatic mechanical material handling equipment to perform at least the first intermediate task and the second access task according to the order of execution priorities.