Handling Limit Minder Driver Advisory System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle safety systems are ineffective in addressing driver errors, which contribute to a significant percentage of roadway collisions, particularly during dynamic driving conditions, as they primarily operate during steady-state or quasi-steady-state driving and lack real-time feedback to prevent handling limit violations.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control system that includes sensors to measure distance, relative speed, and longitudinal acceleration, along with a controller to characterize driver control and provide real-time advisory information through a Handling Limit Minder system, using ESC, ABS, and TCS to monitor and stabilize the vehicle, and a driver characterization module to categorize driving styles and adjust warnings accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing driver warning systems (LDW, FCW) are used, then driver awareness is improved during steady-state driving, but the system becomes ineffective during dynamic driving conditions and transient maneuvers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver warning effectivenessVSAvoidsystem responsiveness to dynamic conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, pre-programmed warning thresholds to dynamic, adaptive thresholds that automatically adjust based on real-time driving conditions. The controller continuously monitors driving state parameters (steering angle, acceleration, speed) and dynamically modifies warning triggers to match the current driving context, enabling effective operation during both steady-state and dynamic conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for warning determination from fixed values to variable parameters that adapt to driving conditions. By monitoring multiple state variables (steering angle rate, lateral acceleration, speed) and adjusting warning thresholds based on their combinations, the system achieves versatility across different driving scenarios without requiring separate warning systems for each condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If general driver warning systems are implemented, then basic safety awareness is provided, but the system fails to account for individual driver behavior patterns and control styles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety warning accuracyVSAvoiddriver-specific adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates continuous feedback loops that monitor driver control inputs (steering angle, acceleration pedal position, brake pedal position) and use this information to adapt warning behavior. The controller analyzes the relationship between driver inputs and vehicle responses over time, adjusting warning thresholds and timing based on observed driver patterns, thereby achieving both accuracy and driver-specific adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary characterization of driver behavior during normal operation by continuously analyzing control inputs and vehicle responses. This preliminary analysis enables the system to establish baseline driver patterns before critical situations arise, allowing warnings to be tailored to individual driver styles rather than using generic thresholds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensors and control systems are integrated for comprehensive monitoring, then driver behavior characterization accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver behavior characterizationVSAvoidsensor and control system integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by using a single controller to perform multiple tasks: monitoring driving state parameters, characterizing driver behavior patterns, determining warning triggers, and controlling warning outputs. By making the controller universal and capable of handling all these functions, the system improves measurement precision through integrated data analysis while avoiding the complexity of separate dedicated systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8886365B2Vehicle and method for advising driver of same
Publication Date: 2014.11.11 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8886365B2 patent drawing
  • US8886365B2 patent drawing
  • US8886365B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for advising a driver of a vehicle may include monitoring driver torque requests, establishing categories of driver behavior based on a history of driver torque requests and associated rates of change thereof, categorizing current driver behavior into one of the established categories based on current driver torque requests and associated rates of change thereof, and initiating an alert for the driver if the categorization is of a particular type.