Handover Access Control for SIPTO and LIPA Bearer Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing handover procedures in wireless communication technologies, such as SIPTO and LIPA, often result in failed handovers due to insufficient access control, leading to wasted signaling and wireless resources, and may not ensure optimal bearers post-handover, affecting Quality of Service (QoS).

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an access control determination procedure before updating wireless bearer information, where the target core network node checks if the bearer supporting SIPTO or LIPA services is permitted to handover, and if not, notifies handover failure or deactivates the bearer to prevent resource wastage and ensure optimal bearer establishment post-handover.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the target core network node updates the wireless bearer information according to the target base station without access control verification, then the handover procedure is simple and fast, but the handover may fail when the target base station is not allowed to access the local gateway, causing wasted signaling and wireless resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover success rateVSAvoidhandover procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing access control verification before updating the wireless bearer information. The target core network node checks whether the target base station is allowed to access the local gateway through the user plane before committing to the handover. This preliminary check prevents failed handovers and waste of signaling resources, while maintaining a relatively simple overall procedure structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the target core network node updates the wireless bearer information without checking access control permissions, then the handover execution is fast, but the Quality of Service may be degraded due to suboptimal bearer establishment

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQuality of ServiceVSAvoidhandover execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs the access control check as a preliminary action before finalizing the bearer establishment. The target core network node determines whether the target base station has permission to access the local gateway through the user plane before updating the wireless bearer information. This ensures optimal bearer establishment for QoS while the check is integrated into the existing handover timing to minimize additional delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If the handover procedure includes access control verification before updating bearer information, then resource wastage is reduced, but the handover procedure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignaling resource wastageVSAvoidhandover procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the access control verification as a preliminary step within the existing handover procedure flow. The target core network node checks the access control permissions before updating wireless bearer information, which prevents unnecessary signaling exchanges and resource allocation for failed handovers. The verification is performed using existing signaling messages, minimizing the increase in procedural complexity while effectively reducing signaling resource wastage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If the handover is performed without verifying bearer permissions, then the handover can be executed quickly, but the bearer establishment may be suboptimal affecting service quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover execution speedVSAvoidbearer optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs the bearer permission verification as a preliminary action that is integrated into the handover execution flow. The target core network node checks whether the target base station is permitted to access the local gateway through the user plane before finalizing the bearer establishment. This approach maintains fast handover execution by using efficient verification methods while ensuring optimal bearer establishment for service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2569981B1Handover method supporting terminal mobility
Publication Date: 2019.12.18 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • EP2569981B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2569981B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2569981B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A handover method for supporting terminal mobility is provided. Before a target core network node updates bearer information according to a target base station to which a User Equipment (UE) performs the handover, an access control determination procedure is added. According to the access control determination information provided by the target base station, if it is determined that the bearer supporting a Selected Internet Protocol (IP) Traffic Offload (SIPTO) or Local IP Access (LIPA) service is permitted to perform the handover, the target core network node updates the bearer information. If it is determined that the bearer supporting the SIPTO or LIPA service is not allowed to perform the handover, the handover failure is notified with respect to the bearer not allowed to perform the handover, and the bearer information is not updated, thus the wasted signaling resource and wireless resource are reduced. Alternatively, during the handover to the target network by the UE or after the handover to the target network, the bearer release or deactivation is performed for the bearer not allowed to perform the handover, so that the UE can re-initiate the bearer establishment process with respect to the bearer not allowed to perform the handover, thus an optimized bearer is established and the Quality of Service (QoS) is ensured.