Handover Random Access Procedure Selection via Indicator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Determining the appropriate type of random access (RA) procedure to perform during a handover in wireless communications is challenging due to differences in RA procedures between source and target base stations, which can lead to inefficiencies and increased latency.

Innovation Solution

The system identifies the type of RA procedure by using indicators included in messages sent between devices involved in the handover, such as wireless devices, source base stations, and core network devices, allowing for the selection between two-step and four-step RA procedures based on specific conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If different RA procedures are performed at source and target base stations during handover, then communication can be initiated, but latency increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover latencyVSAvoidRA procedure compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The source base station performs preliminary actions by determining the target base station's RA procedure type before handover occurs, and includes this information in handover messages. This allows the wireless device to be pre-configured with the correct RA procedure type for the target cell, eliminating delays during the actual handover process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the source base station receives information about the target base station's RA procedure type through handover messages, and this feedback is used to configure the wireless device appropriately. The AMF also provides feedback by including RA procedure type indicators in NAS messages during handover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If RA procedure type is not determined beforehand during handover, then device complexity is reduced, but handover efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover efficiencyVSAvoidRA procedure determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces intermediary elements (source base station, target base station, and AMF) that handle the complexity of RA procedure type determination. These intermediaries exchange information about RA procedure types through standardized messages, shielding the wireless device from complexity while enabling efficient handover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The handover messages serve multiple functions: they transmit mobility information, configure radio resources, and convey RA procedure type indicators. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate signaling mechanisms, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high handover efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12101672B2Handover random access
Publication Date: 2024.09.24 COMCAST CABLE COMM LLC
  • US12101672B2 patent drawing
  • US12101672B2 patent drawing
  • US12101672B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, and methods are described for wireless communications. Random access procedures may include various types of procedures, such as 4-step or 2-step random access procedures. One or more indicators may be included in one or more messages for a handover to indicate a type of a random access procedure.