Hand-wash Compliance Monitoring via Sensor Cross-Counting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods fail to ensure compliance with hand-washing guidelines in healthcare and food industry settings, leading to inadequate hand hygiene and the spread of infections, despite efforts to improve adherence through touch-free systems and alerting technologies.

Innovation Solution

A compliance system that uses sensors to detect hand-washing vigor and duration, providing feedback through a user interface, and incentivizes proper hand hygiene by tracking and rewarding compliant behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If touch-free automatic soap dispensers and hand dryers are implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability of compliance is worsened because employees may not actually wash or adequately follow best practices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of hand-washingVSAvoidcompliance with hand-washing guidelines
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses sensors to detect hand-washing behavior and provides real-time feedback through a user interface, monitoring whether hands are properly washed and providing guidance to ensure compliance with best practices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual monitoring and simple automatic dispensing with an electronic sensing and feedback system that uses sensors, processors, and user interfaces to actively monitor and guide proper hand-washing technique

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If alerting systems are implemented to notify workers of hand-washing needs, then productivity is improved by reducing infections, but device complexity is worsened due to reporting systems and monitoring requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction of nosocomial infectionsVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple functions into a single integrated device: sensing hand-washing behavior, providing real-time feedback, tracking compliance, and generating reports all within one system at the hand-washing station

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors and tracks compliance without requiring additional manual reporting efforts, with sensors and processors handling detection and documentation autonomously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If monitoring systems are implemented to detect hand-washing compliance, then reliability of compliance is improved, but device complexity is worsened due to sensor requirements and data processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of compliant hand-washingVSAvoidcomplexity of sensor and processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual monitoring procedures with electronic sensors and automated processing systems that objectively detect and record hand-washing compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system integrates multiple detection and verification functions into a unified system that simultaneously tracks compliance metrics and provides feedback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9418535B1Hand-wash monitoring and compliance system
Publication Date: 2016.08.16 WASHSENSE INC
  • US9418535B1 patent drawing
  • US9418535B1 patent drawing
  • US9418535B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for monitoring hand-washing compliance can include: detecting sensor readings; calculating movement estimations based on differences between the sensor readings; counting a number of crosses based on how often the movement estimations: are calculated above an upper threshold and are calculated below a lower threshold in consecutive movement calculations, are calculated below the lower threshold and are calculated above the upper threshold in the consecutive movement calculations, or a combination thereof; decrementing a countdown timer based on the number of crosses being above a cross-threshold; and pausing the countdown timer based on the number of crosses being below the cross-threshold.