Handwriting Originality Estimation Using Temporal Feature Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current plagiarism detection methods, especially in academic and online contexts, face challenges in accurately distinguishing between original and non-original content, particularly with the rise of AI-generated content, leading to unreliable results and potential misuse of AI tools in assessments.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method analyzing handwritten content using machine learning classifiers trained on original and non-original samples, extracting features like speed, pauses, and rhythm from temporal timestamps to determine an originality score, classifying content as original or copied.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional plagiarism detection methods are used, then detection coverage is provided, but accuracy and reliability in distinguishing original from non-original content deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidreliability of detection results
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection task into multiple independent analysis dimensions: temporal features (writing speed, pauses, rhythm), pressure features, and trajectory features. Each dimension is analyzed separately by dedicated processing modules, and their results are aggregated to form a comprehensive originality assessment. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in detecting specific aspects of handwriting authenticity, thereby improving overall detection accuracy and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional text-based plagiarism detection to a multi-dimensional analysis approach by incorporating temporal, pressure, and spatial dimensions of handwriting. The system captures handwriting data as time-series sequences with multiple parameters (position, pressure, speed, acceleration) and analyzes them in the time-frequency domain using techniques like FFT and wavelet transforms. This dimensional expansion enables detection of subtle patterns that single-dimensional methods miss, significantly improving detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If manual review processes are used to detect plagiarism, then reliability can be maintained, but time consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated self-service detection by training machine learning models on labeled handwriting data to automatically distinguish original from copied content. The trained models process new handwriting samples independently, generating originality scores without requiring manual reviewer intervention for each case. This automation maintains high reliability through consistent application of detection criteria while eliminating the time consumption and operational complexity of manual review processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual review process with an automated computational system that uses machine learning algorithms to analyze handwriting patterns. The system substitutes human reviewers with algorithmic decision-making based on temporal, pressure, and trajectory features, achieving both high reliability through consistent criterion application and efficiency by processing multiple samples simultaneously without fatigue or scheduling constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If AI-generated content is allowed in assessments, then ease of content creation improves, but originality and academic integrity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of content creationVSAvoidoriginality detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback by generating an originality score that indicates the likelihood of AI-generation or copying. This feedback mechanism allows instructors to identify potentially non-original content while still permitting AI-assisted creation. The feedback loop enables targeted review of suspicious cases rather than blanket prohibition, maintaining academic integrity while accommodating modern content creation practices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent detects AI-generated content by analyzing changes in handwriting parameters that differ between human and AI production. Human handwriting exhibits natural variations in pressure, speed, and trajectory that reflect cognitive processing and motor control patterns. AI-generated or copied handwriting lacks these characteristic variations or displays unnatural patterns. By monitoring parameter distributions and their temporal evolution, the system distinguishes original human content from AI-generated or copied content with high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive handwriting analysis is performed, then detection accuracy improves, but computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoriginality estimation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing handwriting data to extract relevant features before main analysis. Temporal features (writing speed, pauses, rhythm), pressure features, and trajectory features are computed and stored in advance. This preliminary feature extraction organizes raw data into meaningful representations that facilitate more efficient and accurate subsequent analysis, reducing computational complexity during the main detection phase while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using different analysis methods and feature importance weights for different parts of the handwriting sequence. Certain temporal patterns (e.g., pause durations, speed variations) or pressure patterns may be more indicative of authenticity in specific contexts. The system adapts its analysis focus to emphasize locally relevant features, improving detection accuracy without uniformly increasing complexity across all data points. This selective analysis optimizes the balance between precision and computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4488955A1Estimation of originality of a handwritten content
Publication Date: 2025.01.08 MYSCRIPT
  • EP4488955A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4488955A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4488955A1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a computer-implemented method and a computing device for analysing a content (CT1) handwritten by a user (UR1). The method comprises: obtaining the handwritten content (CT1), comprising strokes (SK1) of digital ink, and temporal timestamps (TS1) associated with the strokes; extracting handwriting features (FT1) based on the strokes (SK1) and the associated temporal timestamps (TS1); and determining an originality score (SC1) indicating a probability that the handwritten content (CT1) is an original content generated by the user (UR1) or a non-original content copied by the user (UR1), by using the handwriting features (FT1) as input to at least one predictive model (ML1) of a machine learning classifier (12), said at least one predictive model being trained based on first handwritten samples (CT0a) assumed to be originally generated without copying and second handwritten samples (CT0b) assumed to be non-originally generated by copying.