Digital Handwriting Synthesis Using Normalization Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional digital content rendering techniques lack the ability to convert typed text into personalized and customized handwritten text, limiting user interface interaction to a single generic digital ink style and being computationally inefficient.

Innovation Solution

The development of digital handwriting synthesis techniques that process typed text into digital ink strokes using normalization parameters and machine learning models, specifically transformer architectures, to support a wide range of digital ink styles and allow customization through 'few shot conditioning' for previously unseen styles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional stylus-based input techniques are used to convert handwritten text to typed text, then text input functionality is provided, but the system cannot convert typed text to personalized handwritten text and is limited to a single generic digital ink style

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedigital ink style customizationVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the handwriting synthesis task into distinct components: a transformer-based machine learning model for stroke prediction and a normalization module for style adaptation. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component and enables flexible combination with different machine learning models without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The normalization parameters serve as a universal interface that enables the system to adapt to multiple digital ink styles and different machine learning model architectures. By designing the normalization layer to be model-agnostic, the system achieves multi-functionality where the same core architecture can support various underlying models and style requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If conventional handwriting conversion techniques are used, then basic text conversion is achieved, but computational efficiency is poor and personalization is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidhandwriting style accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by introducing normalization parameters that control the transformation from typed text to digital ink strokes. These parameters enable precise control over handwriting style characteristics while maintaining computational efficiency through optimized transformer model architecture and parameterized style transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed machine learning model is used for handwriting synthesis, then model simplicity is maintained, but the system cannot support previously unseen digital ink styles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for unseen digital ink stylesVSAvoidmodel architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamics by making the normalization parameters adaptable and trainable. Rather than using a static, fixed model, the normalization layer can be dynamically adjusted and fine-tuned to accommodate new digital ink styles through few-shot conditioning, allowing the system to evolve and adapt to previously unseen styles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-training the transformer model and normalization parameters on diverse handwriting data before deployment. This preliminary training enables the system to have built-in capacity for handling various styles, and when new styles are introduced, the pre-trained model provides a strong foundation that requires minimal additional training to adapt.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11508170B2Digital handwriting synthesis
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 ADOBE INC
  • US11508170B2 patent drawing
  • US11508170B2 patent drawing
  • US11508170B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Digital handwriting synthesis techniques and systems are described that are configured to process text represented using text fields into one or more digital ink strokes to represent the text as handwritten data when rendered in a user interface of a computing device. Additionally, the digital handwriting synthesis techniques are configurable using normalization parameters to adjust an output from a machine learning model such that these techniques are extensible across a wide range of machine learning models and may be used to support a wide range of different digital ink styles. Further, the techniques described herein also support customization via “few shot conditioning” in which the digital ink styles may be further customized based on a user input and in this way support previously unseen digital ink styles.