Haptic Feedback System Using Electromagnetic Substrate Oscillation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current human-computer interface systems lack effective methods for providing tactile and auditory feedback that mimic the experience of mechanical buttons, especially in touch sensors without external moving parts or surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a touch sensor with an array of sense and drive electrode pairs, a resistive layer, a vibrator, and a controller that detects force inputs and triggers haptic feedback through a speaker and vibrator to simulate the feel and sound of button presses and releases, using a housing with a coupler to oscillate the touch sensor within a vibration plane.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a touch sensor without external moving parts is used, then device complexity is reduced and reliability is improved, but tactile feedback capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidtactile feedback capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies mechanical vibration by oscillating the substrate in a vibration plane parallel to the touch sensor surface. A magnetic element rigidly coupled to the chassis interacts with an inductor to generate controlled vibrations that simulate mechanical button press and release sensations, providing tactile feedback without external moving parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical button structures with an electromagnetic actuation system. A magnetic element and inductor combination generates electromagnetic forces to oscillate the substrate, substituting mechanical linkages and moving parts with a more reliable electromagnetic mechanism that provides equivalent tactile feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If electromagnetic actuation components are added, then tactile feedback capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetactile feedback capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the actuation components (magnetic element and inductor) directly with the substrate structure. The magnetic element is rigidly coupled to the chassis while the inductor is coupled to the substrate, creating an integrated electromagnetic actuation system that minimizes additional complexity by combining multiple functions into unified components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate serves multiple functions: it acts as the structural support for the touch sensor array, the oscillating element for haptic feedback, and the mounting surface for the inductor. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while maintaining tactile feedback capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables a tactile and auditory feedback mechanism that replicates the experience of mechanical buttons, allowing users to interact with a touch sensor surface as if pressing physical buttons, without the need for external moving parts, enhancing user interaction and feedback.

Implementation Method 1

an inductor coupled to the substrate below the touch sensor surface and configured to magnetically couple to the magnetic element, a driver configured to intermittently source current to the inductor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a resistive layer arranged over the substrate in contact with the sense electrode and drive electrode pairs, defining a touch sensor surface opposite the substrate, and defining a material exhibiting changes in local bulk resistance responsive to variations in magnitude of force applied to the touch sensor surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoresistive effect: Piezoresistive Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3762808B1Human-computer interface system
Publication Date: 2024.02.21 SENSEL INC
  • EP3762808B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3762808B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3762808B1 patent drawingFigure 5A~7

AI summary

One variation of a system for detecting and responding to touch inputs with haptic feedback includes: a magnetic element rigidly coupled to a chassis; a substrate; a touch sensor interposed between the substrate and a touch sensor surface; an inductor coupled to the substrate below the touch sensor surface and configured to magnetically couple to the magnetic element; a coupler coupling the substrate to the chassis, compliant within a vibration plane approximately parallel to the touch sensor surface, and locating the inductor approximately over the magnetic element; and a controller configured to intermittently polarize the inductor responsive to detection of a touch input on the touch sensor surface to oscillate the substrate in the vibration plane relative to the chassis.