Haptic Feedback Interface for Messaging Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing messaging systems lack the tactile or haptic feedback necessary to replicate the engagement and intimacy of face-to-face communication, limiting user interaction and engagement.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating haptic capabilities into the communication interface of messaging systems, allowing users to experience tactile feedback during interactions, thereby enhancing the sense of touch and depth in digital communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional messaging interfaces are used, then device complexity is minimized, but user engagement and communication depth deteriorate due to lack of tactile feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagementVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines visual display elements with haptic feedback mechanisms into a unified communication interface. The tactile feedback portion is integrated with the visual display, allowing users to simultaneously see and feel communications, thereby enhancing engagement without requiring separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a tactile dimension to the traditionally two-dimensional visual interface. By incorporating haptic feedback that responds to touch inputs, the interface transitions from purely visual interaction to multi-sensory interaction, enhancing user engagement through tactile sensations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If haptic feedback is integrated into the communication interface, then user engagement and communication depth are enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication depthVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic feedback portion is configured to dynamically respond to user touch inputs on the visual display. The tactile feedback characteristics can be adjusted based on the type of communication, user preferences, and interaction context, allowing the system to adapt rather than requiring complex fixed configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of information

If tactile feedback is added to replicate face-to-face communication, then communication intimacy is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication intimacyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic feedback operates periodically or intermittently based on communication events rather than continuously. Tactile feedback is activated during specific interactions such as receiving messages, making calls, or video calls, and remains inactive during idle periods, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining communication intimacy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12216827B2Electronic communication interface with haptic feedback response
Publication Date: 2025.02.04 SNAP INC
  • US12216827B2 patent drawing
  • US12216827B2 patent drawing
  • US12216827B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for generating haptic feedback responses starts with processor causing communication interface for communication session to be displayed on first user interface and on a second user interface. Processor detects first touch input on first user interface and second touch input on second user interface. Processor monitors location of the first touch input on the first user interface and location of the second touch input on the second user interface. Processor determines distance between location of first touch input on first user interface and location on first user interface corresponding to location of second touch input on second user interface. Processor causes the first user interface and the second user interface to generate a haptic feedback response based on the distance. The haptic feedback response increases in intensity or speed as the distance decreases and decreases in intensity or speed as the distance increases. Other embodiments are described herein.