Haptic Feedback via Steering Wheel for Contactless Command Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing human-machine interfaces for motor vehicles face challenges in providing reliable and safe feedback to users about the recognition of contactless commands, as visual and auditory feedback methods can be distracting and inadequate in noisy environments.

Innovation Solution

A human-machine interface that includes a control device for detecting contactless commands and a haptic feedback device, which uses an equipment item like the steering wheel or armrest to provide tactile feedback, allowing users to perceive recognition without diverting their gaze from the road and regardless of ambient noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If visual feedback systems are used to indicate command recognition, then the user can see whether the command has been recognized, but the user must divert the eyes from the road which is dangerous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback informationVSAvoidsafety risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces visual feedback (optical system) with haptic feedback (mechanical/tactile system). The control device generates haptic signals that are transmitted through the steering wheel or seat to the user's body, allowing command recognition feedback without visual attention, thus resolving the contradiction between information delivery and safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the steering wheel or seat as an intermediary medium to transmit haptic feedback signals to the user. This intermediary allows the feedback to be delivered through the user's body contact points without requiring visual diversion from the road

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If auditory feedback systems are used to confirm command recognition, then the user can remain focused on the road, but the feedback can be inadequate depending on ambient noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety maintenanceVSAvoidfeedback reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces auditory feedback (acoustic system) with haptic feedback (mechanical/tactile system). The haptic signals are transmitted through solid contact points (steering wheel, seat) that are not affected by ambient noise, ensuring reliable feedback delivery while maintaining user focus on the road

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If contactless commands are used to control vehicle functions, then the user can control equipment without physical contact, but it is difficult for the user to know whether the function has been correctly recognized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontactless controlVSAvoidcommand recognition feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a haptic feedback mechanism where the control device provides tactile signals through the steering wheel or seat to confirm command recognition. This feedback loop allows the user to know whether the contactless command has been correctly recognized without requiring visual or auditory attention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the steering wheel or seat as an intermediary to transmit haptic feedback signals to the user's body, providing command recognition confirmation through tactile sensation rather than visual or auditory channels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables users to receive reliable and safe feedback on command recognition, enhancing safety by providing a perceptible haptic signal that is not affected by noise levels and does not require visual attention.

Implementation Method 1

the sensor comprises an infrared system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared detection: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

the sensor comprises an infrared system and/or a capacitive system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitive detection: Capacitance

Implementation Method 3

the feedback device comprises a vibrating device configured to communicate one or more vibrations to the equipment item

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical vibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS10310604B2Human-machine interface for a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 DAV
  • US10310604B2 patent drawing
  • US10310604B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A human-machine interface for a motor vehicle, comprising: —a command device (1) comprising at least one sensor configured to detect a command without contact by the user, and —a haptic feedback device (2) to control the consideration of said command, characterized in that —the haptic feedback device engages with a component (3) in the motor vehicle passenger compartment, said component being distinct from the command device, —said component being intended to come into contact with a part of in the body (5) of the user in order to perceive the haptic feedback signal.