Haptic Input Device False Positive Reduction in Robotic Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic surgical systems face challenges in accurately controlling medical instruments due to issues with false positive haptic inputs, which can lead to unintended movements of surgical tools, compromising the precision and safety of medical procedures.

Innovation Solution

The development of an input device with a multi-link grasper and sensor system that includes a central longitudinal member with hall effect sensors and capacitive sensors to detect user presence and control the robotic arm, allowing for precise control and decoupling from the surgical tool operation, and transitioning to safe modes when user control is lost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If haptic feedback is provided to the operator during robotic surgical procedures, then the operator gains tactile awareness of tool interaction with tissue, but false positive haptic inputs may cause unintended movements compromising precision and safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of medical proceduresVSAvoidaccuracy of haptic input detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where sensor data from the surgical tool is compared against expected haptic thresholds. When the measured haptic input exceeds the threshold, the system provides feedback to the operator indicating potential false positive input, allowing the operator to correct the issue before unintended movements occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer between the haptic sensor and the robotic tool control. This intermediary layer analyzes sensor signals to distinguish between intentional operator inputs and false positive haptic inputs, preventing false inputs from directly controlling tool movement while maintaining responsiveness to genuine operator commands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are used to detect user presence and control inputs, then the system can distinguish between intentional and unintentional inputs, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of user presence detectionVSAvoidnumber of sensors and processing components
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multi-functional sensors that serve multiple purposes: detecting user presence, measuring haptic input forces, and monitoring tool position. By making sensors perform multiple functions, the system achieves high measurement precision without proportionally increasing device complexity, as the same hardware components are utilized for different detection tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the precision and safety of robotic surgical procedures by reducing false positive haptic inputs and ensuring controlled operation of surgical tools, maintaining precision and safety even when unintended movements occur.

Implementation Method 1

The central longitudinal member can include a hall effect sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Implementation Method 2

capacitive sensors to detect user presence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS20230125107A1Reduction of false positive haptic inputs in a robotic surgical system
Publication Date: 2023.04.27 AURIS HEALTH INC
  • US20230125107A1 patent drawing
  • US20230125107A1 patent drawing
  • US20230125107A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical system may include an input device for controlling a medical instrument. The input device may include a grasper for receiving user input and a sensor coupled to the grasper for generating sensor information related to a user presence at the grasper. The medical system may also include a processor and memory that stores instructions for receiving secondary information associated with the grasper and determining a user presence at the grasper based on the sensor information and the secondary information. A method for operating the medical system with the input device is also disclosed herein.