Electromechanical Haptic Locking Actuator for Adjustable Detent Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing operating devices lack improved locking behavior and flexibility in detent settings, with mechanical detents being inflexible and prone to wear, limiting user experience and precision in control tasks.

Innovation Solution

An operating device with an electric motor and control device that simulates a detent by generating force signals to mimic mechanical locking, allowing adjustable detent positions, strengths, and timing, enabling precise and customizable haptic feedback without mechanical wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a mechanical detent is used to provide locking behavior, then the operating element achieves stable positioning, but the detent is prone to wear and lacks flexibility in adjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking stabilityVSAvoiddetent adjustability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical detent system with an electromechanical actuator that applies controlled force to the operating element. This substitution eliminates mechanical wear between detent components while enabling flexible, programmable positioning through electronic control signals, thus achieving both reliability and adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from fixed mechanical geometry to variable electrical control signals. The actuator's force application point and magnitude can be dynamically adjusted through control signals, allowing the detent position and strength to be modified without physical reconfiguration, thereby achieving adaptability while maintaining stable positioning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a mechanical detent is used to provide locking behavior, then the operating element achieves stable positioning, but the detent components are subject to mechanical wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking stabilityVSAvoidcomponent service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical detent system with an electromechanical actuator that applies controlled force to the operating element. This substitution eliminates mechanical wear between detent components while enabling flexible, programmable positioning through electronic control signals, thus achieving both reliability and adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If an electromechanical actuator is used to simulate detent, then flexibility and adjustability are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetent customizabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electromechanical actuator serves multiple functions: it provides the detent locking force, enables programmable positioning, and can be controlled through standardized control signals. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate mechanical detent mechanisms and simplifies the overall system architecture despite the added electronic control capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a realistic and adjustable locking mechanism that enhances user experience with precise control, adaptable to various applications and reducing mechanical wear, allowing for flexible detent settings and precise regulation.

Implementation Method 1

an electric motor (20) for direct or indirect application of force to the operating element (12)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentEP3130978B1Operating device with electromechanical haptic locking function
Publication Date: 2019.07.10 W GESSMANN GMBH
  • EP3130978B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3130978B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b
  • EP3130978B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to an operating device (10) for controlling or regulating a device by a user (32). The operating device (10) has a control element (12) that can be deflected by the user (32) so that the operating device (10) generates or modifies an electrical signal to control/regulate the device. The operating device (10) has an electric motor (20) that is at least indirectly connected to the control element (12). The electric motor (20) is configured to assist and decelerate the actuation of the control element (12) by the user (32). The operating device (10) further has a control unit (38) configured to control the electric motor (20) such that the user (32) receives the haptic impression of a mechanical detent at a preset detent deflection.The control device (38) is designed to control the electric motor (20) such that the operating element (12) is pulled towards the detent deflection in the immediate vicinity of the detent deflection, i.e., within a predetermined detent area. The deflection range of the operating element (12), in which the operating element (12) is pulled towards the detent deflection, is preferably symmetrical to the detent deflection. The invention further relates to a method for controlling such an operating device 10.