Haptic Feedback Operating Unit with Localized Electroactive Polymer Actuators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine control units, such as sidesticks in aircraft, require extensive device technology and space to provide haptic feedback, which can interfere with precise control and are not ergonomically intuitive, especially when the entire input element needs to be equipped with feedback functions.

Innovation Solution

A compact operating unit that integrates a manually operated input element with a haptic feedback element, where the feedback is limited to a specific area, utilizing electroactive polymers or other actuators, allowing for precise control and intuitive feedback without distracting from the main input function, and optionally incorporating visual displays for additional information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If haptic feedback is provided across the entire input element, then comprehensive feedback is achieved, but device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehaptic feedback completenessVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The input element is divided into two distinct functional zones: a feedback element that generates haptic feedback and a remaining area that provides precise control input. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific function, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining feedback effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Haptic feedback is localized to a specific portion of the input element rather than being distributed across the entire surface. This local quality approach concentrates feedback resources where most needed while preserving precision control in other areas, thereby reducing equipment complexity and space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If haptic feedback is provided across the entire input element, then comprehensive feedback is achieved, but space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehaptic feedback completenessVSAvoidspace requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The input element is divided into two distinct functional zones: a feedback element that generates haptic feedback and a remaining area that provides precise control input. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific function, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining feedback effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Haptic feedback is localized to a specific portion of the input element rather than being distributed across the entire surface. This local quality approach concentrates feedback resources where most needed while preserving precision control in other areas, thereby reducing equipment complexity and space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the entire input element is equipped with feedback functions, then comprehensive feedback is provided, but control precision is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback coverageVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The input element is divided into two distinct functional zones: a feedback element that generates haptic feedback and a remaining area that provides precise control input. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific function, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining feedback effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Haptic feedback is localized to a specific portion of the input element rather than being distributed across the entire surface. This local quality approach concentrates feedback resources where most needed while preserving precision control in other areas, thereby reducing equipment complexity and space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate and sensitive machine control with reduced device complexity and space requirements, providing operators with relevant haptic feedback without compromising the input element's functionality, and offering ergonomic design and intuitive feedback.

Implementation Method 1

A reconfigurable, tactile human-machine interface is known from US 2010/207775 A1. From EP 2 385 518 A2 a device is disclosed which can give a user of the device haptic feedback by means of electroactive polymer actuators.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroactive polymer: Electroactive Polymer

Implementation Method 2

This can be achieved by vibrating the sidestick as a whole or by generating variable operating forces or resistances depending on the airspeed in response to the pilot's control inputs.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHaptic feedback mechanism:

Data Source

PatentEP3477419B1Operating unit for controlling machines or the like
Publication Date: 2020.12.09 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3477419B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3477419B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3477419B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

An operating unit (10; 10a) for controlling machines or the like, with a manually operable input element (11) arranged to move in the direction of at least one axis (x, y, z) or about at least one axis (x, y, z) wherein at least one feedback element (30) generating a haptic force (F) is arranged on a part of the input element (11).