Dual-Chip Haptic Unit with Piezoelectric Load Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional touch sensors detect position information but not pressing load, and existing solutions do not effectively utilize pressing load data for application processing, leading to a lack of integrated control between touch sensor and tactile sensation provision chips.

Innovation Solution

A tactile sensation providing apparatus with dual chips, a host unit for overall control and a haptic unit for tactile sensation control, exchanges signals indicating pressing load detected by a piezoelectric element to enable application processing based on the detected load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a tactile sensation providing chip is added to enable tactile feedback, then tactile sensation function is improved, but device complexity increases due to dual chip architecture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetactile sensation functionVSAvoiddual chip architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two functional modules: a host unit containing the touch sensor and application control, and a separate haptic unit containing the piezoelectric element for tactile feedback. This segmentation allows each unit to be optimized independently while maintaining clear functional boundaries through defined communication protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The haptic unit is designed with multi-functionality to serve both tactile sensation provision and pressing load detection purposes. By integrating the piezoelectric element that can both generate vibrations and detect applied pressure, the system reduces overall complexity despite the dual-chip architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If pressing load detection is implemented in the haptic unit, then measurement capability is improved, but information utilization is worsened as the host unit cannot access load data for application processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressing load detectionVSAvoidpressing load information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic unit provides feedback to the host unit about the pressing load detected by the piezoelectric element. This feedback mechanism enables the host unit to access load information for application processing decisions, such as determining whether a touch input constitutes a valid button press or gesture command.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the pressing load detection capability with the tactile feedback function in the haptic unit. The same piezoelectric element that generates vibrations also detects applied pressure, and both functions are coordinated through communication between the haptic and host units to provide integrated touch input processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If the haptic unit independently controls tactile provision, then ease of operation is improved, but integration with application processing is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent tactile controlVSAvoidcontrol integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A defined communication interface acts as an intermediary between the haptic unit and host unit. This intermediary mechanism allows the haptic unit to independently control tactile feedback while receiving control signals and status information from the host unit, coordinating both functions without direct complex integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables application processing and tactile sensation feedback by effectively utilizing pressing load data, allowing for appropriate user interface responses and reduced processing and power consumption.

Implementation Method 1

detects the pressing load applied to a predetermined area (pressing load corresponding area) of a touch sensor face by using, for example, the piezoelectric element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

vibrates the touch sensor when the input apparatus detects an input applying a predetermined pressing load or greater to a predetermined area of the touch sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP2600225B1Tactile feedback device, and tactile feedback device control method
Publication Date: 2019.03.27 KYOCERA CORP
  • EP2600225B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2600225B1 patent drawingFigure 2(a)~2(b)
  • EP2600225B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

By dual chips exchanging a signal indicating a pressing load detected for providing the tactile sensation, application process based thereon is performed. A tactile sensation providing apparatus includes a touch sensor, a load detection unit for detecting the pressing load on the sensor for providing the sensation, a tactile sensation providing unit for vibrating a surface the sensor, a provision control unit for controlling drive of the providing unit, and a main control unit for controlling an application. The main control unit determines whether a predetermined area of the surface is touched based on an output of the sensor and, when touched, transmits an instruction to the provision control unit. The provision control unit, upon receiving the instruction from the main control unit, detects the pressing load and transmits the detected load to the main control unit. The main control unit, based on the load, performs the application process.