Haptic Seat Actuator Array Reconfiguration for Driver Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle alert systems rely on audio and visual cues, which may not effectively capture a driver's attention, especially in distracting environments, and lack personalized haptic feedback tailored to the occupant's physical profile and preferences.

Innovation Solution

A haptic alert system integrated into vehicle seats, utilizing an array of haptic actuators that adjust and calibrate based on the occupant's profile, providing personalized and directional haptic feedback through dynamic reconfiguration and intensity adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If audio and visual alerts are used to warn the driver, then the alert system can provide notification, but the driver's attention may not be effectively captured in distracting environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert effectivenessVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The alert system is segmented into multiple independent haptic actuators distributed across the seat surface, allowing different regions to provide distinct tactile feedback patterns that can capture driver attention more effectively than unified audio/visual alerts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies localized haptic feedback to specific regions of the driver's body through targeted actuator activation, creating personalized tactile alerts that are more likely to capture attention and convey directional information about hazards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed haptic actuator configuration is used in the seat, then the device complexity is reduced, but the system cannot provide personalized feedback tailored to the occupant's physical profile

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalized haptic feedbackVSAvoidhaptic actuator configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic actuator configuration is made dynamic through automated reconfiguration based on detected occupant characteristics such as body type, seating position, and contact points, allowing the system to adapt to different users without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically detecting occupant profile characteristics and configuring the haptic actuator array accordingly, eliminating the need for manual setup while providing personalized feedback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If all haptic actuators are activated simultaneously, then the notification coverage is maximized, but the occupant may not gain spatial awareness of the alert direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification deliveryVSAvoidspatial awareness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic actuator array is segmented into multiple independently controllable groups, allowing selective activation of specific regions to convey directional information about hazards while maintaining overall notification coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a spatial dimension to haptic feedback by activating actuators in specific patterns across the seat surface, creating tactile gradients that indicate direction and location of hazards beyond simple presence/absence of vibration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If the haptic actuator intensity is set high, then the alert is more noticeable, but the occupant comfort is reduced and misinterpretation of alerts may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert detectabilityVSAvoidoccupant discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different intensity levels to different regions of the haptic actuator array based on the specific alert type and occupant profile, providing sufficient detectability while avoiding excessive intensity that would cause discomfort or misinterpretation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts haptic actuator intensity parameters based on detected occupant characteristics such as body mass, contact area, and sensitivity, optimizing the balance between alert detectability and comfort for each user

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10399492B1Automatic reconfiguration and calibration of haptic seats
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US10399492B1 patent drawing
  • US10399492B1 patent drawing
  • US10399492B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Technical solutions are described herein for adjusting a notification system of a vehicle. An example method includes receiving, by a controller, an occupant profile of an occupant of the vehicle. The method further includes adjusting, by the controller, a haptic array according to the occupant profile, the haptic array comprising a plurality of haptic actuators, the adjusting comprising activating a first subset of the haptic actuators and deactivating a second subset of the haptic actuators. Further, the method includes providing, by the haptic array, a notification to the occupant of the vehicle by providing a haptic feedback using the activated haptic actuators.