User Interaction Detection with Cross-Talk Removal in Haptic Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cross-talk in sensor signals caused by actuator feedback interferes with the detection of subsequent user interactions, leading to unreliable feedback and false user interaction detection in electronic devices.

Innovation Solution

A processor is used to identify and remove or ignore cross-talk in sensor signals, allowing for accurate detection of user interactions by generating a new signal or ignoring the cross-talk, thereby improving the reliability of feedback in electronic devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If haptic feedback is provided after each button press, then user feedback reliability is improved, but cross-talk in sensor signals prevents subsequent interactions from being detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback reliabilityVSAvoiduser interaction detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes cross-talk signals from the sensor output signal. The processor identifies cross-talk components caused by actuator operation and subtracts them from the total signal, leaving only the genuine user interaction components for accurate detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing stage between the sensor and the interaction detection logic. The processor acts as a mediator that separates cross-talk from genuine interaction signals, allowing both haptic feedback and accurate interaction detection to coexist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If cross-talk is not removed from sensor signals, then signal processing is simpler, but false user interactions are detected leading to incorrect feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal processing complexityVSAvoidinteraction detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-characterizing the cross-talk signal profile during system calibration. The cross-talk characteristics are stored and then used to compensate for cross-talk in real-time operation, simplifying the ongoing signal processing while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Volume of moving object

If sensor and actuator are closely coupled, then device size is reduced, but cross-talk interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidcross-talk interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful cross-talk effect into a beneficial signal characteristic. By characterizing the cross-talk profile and using it for compensation, the system transforms what was previously interference into a known, correctable component, enabling accurate interaction detection despite close coupling of sensor and actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS20240053829A1Method and apparatus for identifying user interactions
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 CAMBRIDGE MECHATRONICS
  • US20240053829A1 patent drawing
  • US20240053829A1 patent drawing
  • US20240053829A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Broadly speaking, embodiments of the present techniques provide a method for identifying user interactions with an electronic apparatus. It is desirable to provide feedback to a user each time they interact with certain parts of the electronic apparatus. However, an actuator used to provide the feedback may interfere with a signal output by a sensor, such that it becomes difficult to identify true subsequent user interactions. The present techniques provide ways to process a raw signal output by a sensor to enable user interactions to be more easily distinguished from the interference (e.g. cross-talk).