Haptic Feedback System for Smooth Surface Interface Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electronic devices with minimalistic user interfaces lack tactile and kinesthetic feedback, leading to user engagement issues and interaction breakdowns, such as difficulty in locating controls and differentiating between them.

Innovation Solution

The use of a tactile sensor system that combines touch tracking, force sensing, and haptic feedback to simulate physical interfaces, such as push-button and slider interfaces, on a smooth surface, providing users with tactile and kinesthetic feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If physical interfaces (buttons, edges, indents, textures, protrusions, depressions) are removed to maintain a smooth surface, then aesthetics and manufacturing simplicity are improved, but tactile and kinesthetic feedback are lost, leading to degraded user experience and interaction breakdowns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesmooth surfaceVSAvoidtactile feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical physical interfaces (buttons, edges, indents, textures, protrusions, depressions) with an electronic haptic feedback system. The smooth surface maintains aesthetics while haptic actuators generate simulated tactile feedback through controlled vibrations and forces, substituting mechanical feedback with electronically controlled haptic effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces haptic feedback as an intermediary between the user and the device interface. The haptic system acts as a mediator that translates touch interactions into tactile sensations, allowing users to perceive virtual interface elements through haptic feedback without requiring physical structural features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If physical interfaces are removed to reduce manufacturing complexity and cost, then ease of manufacture is improved, but user engagement and interaction reliability deteriorate due to lack of tactile feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiduser interaction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical interface structures with a simplified smooth surface and electronic haptic feedback system. This substitution reduces manufacturing complexity while maintaining interaction reliability through programmable haptic effects that provide consistent tactile feedback for different interface elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes in haptic feedback (amplitude, frequency, duration, pattern) to differentiate between various interface elements and states. By dynamically adjusting haptic parameters, the system provides reliable tactile distinction between buttons, sliders, and other controls without requiring physical structural differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a smooth surface interface is used, then device simplicity and aesthetics are improved, but user ability to locate and differentiate controls deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface simplicityVSAvoidcontrol location detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses haptic feedback patterns as a sensory signature for different interface elements, analogous to color coding. Each control element has distinctive haptic characteristics (vibration patterns, resistance, texture simulation) that allow users to locate and differentiate controls through tactile perception rather than visual or structural cues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The haptic feedback system serves as an intermediary that provides spatial and tactile information about control locations and identities. The haptic mediator communicates interface element properties to the user's tactile sense, enabling detection and differentiation of controls on a smooth surface without visual or structural markers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances user experience by allowing users to interact with simulated physical interfaces that provide necessary feedback, improving engagement and reducing interaction breakdowns.

Implementation Method 1

a haptic feedback device to generate vibrations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic actuation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12254135B2Simulation of a physical interface utilizing touch tracking, force sensing, and haptic feedback
Publication Date: 2025.03.18 CIRQUE CORP
  • US12254135B2 patent drawing
  • US12254135B2 patent drawing
  • US12254135B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Simulation of a physical interface utilizing touch tracking, force sensing, and haptic feedback is presented herein. A system tracks, via a touch sensing device of a tactile sensor of the system, a movement of a finger across the tactile sensor; in response to a location of the movement being determined to correspond to an interactive surface of the tactile sensor, the system generates, at the location, a first haptic feedback representing a defined type of simulated physical interface; based on the defined type of simulated physical interface, the system detects a force that has been applied to the tactile sensor; and in response to the force being determined to satisfy a defined force condition representing that an action is to be initiated, the system generates, via the interactive surface, a second haptic feedback representing that the action has been initiated by the system.