Haptic Surgical Handle With Force Feedback for Precise Grasp and Roll

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic surgery systems lack ergonomic handles that conform to the surgeon's hand and provide haptic feedback, making it difficult for surgeons to perform precise procedures without direct contact and palpation, which can lead to tissue damage and inability to detect abnormal tissues.

Innovation Solution

A handle for tele-robotic surgery featuring a main body with a fine-tuning roll mechanism and a grasp control mechanism, including dynamometers for force feedback, allows for two degrees of freedom and provides haptic feedback to the surgeon through a processing unit that transmits data on force and couple measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If robotic surgery systems use a standard handle design, then the device complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but the ergonomic fit to the surgeon's hand is poor and surgical precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidsurgical precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The handle incorporates adjustable components including a movable thumb rest and rotatable control knobs that can be positioned according to individual surgeon preferences, transforming a static standardized handle into a dynamically adaptable interface that maintains both manufacturability and surgical precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The handle design allows modification of geometric parameters such as grip diameter, control lever angles, and button positions to match ergonomic requirements, enabling a single manufacturable base design to accommodate varying surgical precision needs through parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If robotic surgery systems provide direct visual control only, then the device complexity is minimized, but the surgeon's ability to detect abnormal tissues and perform palpation is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidtactile feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates force feedback mechanisms in the handle that provide the surgeon with tactile information about tissue resistance and abnormal structures, restoring palpation capability through artificial feedback loops that convert visual data back into tactile sensations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The handle acts as an intermediary device that translates visual surgical field information into haptic feedback signals, mediating between the visual-only robotic control system and the surgeon's tactile perception needs without requiring direct physical contact with tissues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If the surgeon operates the master robot without haptic feedback, then the device complexity is reduced, but tissue damage risk increases due to inability to perceive contact degree

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidtissue damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The force feedback system provides advance warning to the surgeon about approaching tissue contact and resistance levels, allowing the surgeon to adjust control inputs before excessive force is applied, thereby cushioning against potential tissue damage through predictive tactile information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS11452573B2Handle for robotic surgery
Publication Date: 2022.09.27 SINA ROBOTICS & MEDICAL INNOVATORS CO
  • US11452573B2 patent drawing
  • US11452573B2 patent drawing
  • US11452573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein a haptic handling system for tele-robotic surgery. The haptic handling system may include a main body, a fine-tuning roll mechanism, and a grasp control mechanism. The main body may include a first hollow cylindrical section and a second hollow cylindrical section. The fine-tuning roll mechanism may include a knob, a roller coupled to the knob, and a roll encoder coupled to the roller. The grasp control mechanism may include a slider comprising an internal slider and an external slider, a lead screw coupled to the slider, and a grasp encoder coupled to the lead screw. The haptic handling system may further include a force feedback system comprising one or more dynamometers measuring a magnitude and a direction of a couple and a force applied to a surgical tool, a roll actuator coupled to the roller, and a grasp actuator coupled to the lead screw.