Hard Hat Face Guard Structure for Cut-Off Tool Kickback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing construction helmets do not provide sufficient protection against kickback events from cut-off tools, which can cause severe injuries, and often compromise comfort and ventilation.

Innovation Solution

A face protection accessory with a U-shaped supporting frame and guard bars, anchored above the helmet's base plane, provides enhanced protection by distributing impact energy and incorporating shock-absorbing elements, while maintaining comfort and compatibility with existing helmets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a face protection mask is added to the protective helmet, then protection against kickback events is improved, but the weight and comfort of the helmet deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against kickback eventsVSAvoidweight of helmet
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The face protection is segmented into multiple guard bars (first guard bar, second guard bar) arranged in a U-shaped configuration, allowing the protection structure to be distributed across different locations rather than concentrated in one heavy component. This segmentation provides effective kickback protection while minimizing overall weight addition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The guard bars are positioned at specific locations (transversal to the U-shaped frame, between cheek-bone portions) where kickback forces are most likely to impact the face. This localized placement of protective elements provides targeted protection without adding weight to areas where protection is not needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If a face protection mask is added to the protective helmet, then protection against kickback events is improved, but the comfort and ventilation of the helmet deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against kickback eventsVSAvoidcomfort and ventilation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The U-shaped supporting frame is formed from a thin, lightweight plastic material that provides structural protection while maintaining flexibility. This thin-film approach allows the protection structure to conform to the face without creating bulk that would impede ventilation or comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The protection is divided into separate guard bars rather than a solid continuous shield, creating gaps between the bars that allow air flow and ventilation while still providing effective protection against kickback forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If a bulky face protection mask is used, then protection coverage is improved, but the suitability for construction work deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection coverageVSAvoidsuitability for construction work
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The face protection uses a thin, lightweight plastic frame that forms a compact U-shaped structure rather than a bulky solid mask. This thin-film design provides adequate coverage while maintaining a sleek profile suitable for construction environments where mobility and comfort are essential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The face protection accessory is designed to be releasably attachable and removable from the helmet, allowing workers to dynamically adjust or remove the protection when not needed, rather than being permanently fixed in a bulky configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Object-affected harmful factors

If existing face protection accessories are used, then protection against spray and dust is improved, but protection against kickback events deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against spray and dustVSAvoidprotection against kickback events
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The guard bars are arranged in a curved U-shaped configuration that follows the contour of the face, creating a more effective barrier against directional kickback forces compared to flat or linear protection designs. The curvature allows the structure to deflect and distribute impact forces more effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The face protection combines a lightweight plastic U-shaped frame with rigid guard bar elements, creating a composite structure that provides both the flexibility needed for comfort and the rigidity required to resist kickback forces, unlike single-material existing accessories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The accessory effectively mitigates kickback impacts by distributing and absorbing energy, ensuring safety without adding significant weight or discomfort, and allowing integration with various helmet types.

Implementation Method 1

The guard bar and the U-shaped supporting frame together provide sufficient protection for a wearer in case of a kickback event

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact Force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS12527377B2Reinforced face protection accessories for hard hats
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 HUSQVARNA AB
  • US12527377B2 patent drawing
  • US12527377B2 patent drawing
  • US12527377B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A face protection accessory (110) for assembly with a protective helmet (100) to protect a wearer (300) during a cut-off tool kickback event, wherein the accessory (110) comprises a U-shaped supporting frame (115) extending between left and right temple anchoring points (120l, 120r), via left and right check-bone portions (130l, 130r) arranged on either side of the U-shaped supporting frame (115), and a chin portion (140) arranged at a distal end of the accessory (110), where the temple anchoring points (120l, 120r) are configured to attach to the protective helmet (100), and wherein at least a first guard bar (150) extends transversal to the U-shaped supporting frame (115) between the left and the right check-bone portions (130l, 130r).