Hardbanding Removal Apparatus with Dynamic Grinding Depth Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hardbanding removal systems face challenges with uneven erosion, improper application, tubular eccentricity, and 'pipe walk' during grinding, leading to incomplete or damaging removal of hardbanding, requiring manual correction and increasing time and cost.

Innovation Solution

A hardbanding removal apparatus with a grinding wheel assembly, idler wheel system, and shock absorber, which adjusts depth and compensates for tubular eccentricity and movement, allowing precise and uniform removal by tracing contours and preventing lateral movement during rotation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a fixed-depth grinding system is used to remove hardbanding, then the grinding depth is consistent, but uneven hardbanding deposits result in under-grinding of high spots or over-grinding of low spots

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding depth consistencyVSAvoidcomplete hardbanding removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding wheel assembly is made dynamically adjustable through the linkage system and shock absorber, allowing the grinding depth to be varied in real-time based on the actual hardbanding thickness and tubular surface conditions, rather than using a fixed grinding depth setting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The idler wheel assembly provides continuous feedback about the tubular surface position and hardbanding thickness, which is transmitted through the linkage system to automatically adjust the grinding wheel depth, ensuring consistent hardbanding removal without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the drill pipe is rotated during grinding to address eccentricity, then all surfaces can be accessed, but the distance between the pipe surface and grinding wheel changes, causing uneven removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to all pipe surfacesVSAvoidgrinding uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The support arm and linkage system allow the grinding wheel assembly to dynamically adjust its position and orientation during pipe rotation, maintaining optimal contact pressure and grinding depth despite changes in the distance between the pipe surface and grinding wheel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The shock absorber acts as a counterbalancing mechanism that compensates for the varying gravitational and centrifugal forces experienced during pipe rotation, maintaining consistent grinding pressure and preventing uneven removal caused by eccentricity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Manufacturing precision

If manual correction is performed to fix under or over grinding, then accuracy can be improved, but time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding accuracyVSAvoidcorrection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding system is designed to be self-correcting through the automatic depth adjustment mechanism, where the idler wheel and linkage system continuously monitor and adjust the grinding depth to prevent under or over-grinding from occurring in the first place, eliminating the need for manual correction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous feedback loop between the idler wheel, linkage system, and grinding wheel assembly ensures that any deviations from the desired grinding depth are automatically detected and corrected in real-time, preventing the need for post-processing manual corrections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If grinding pressure is applied to remove hardbanding, then removal efficiency increases, but pipe walk occurs reducing accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardbanding removal rateVSAvoidgrinding accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The shock absorber provides a counterbalancing force that opposes the grinding pressure, preventing pipe walk by maintaining a stable equilibrium between the downward grinding force and the upward compensating force from the shock absorber

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The linkage system and shock absorber create a dynamically balanced system that allows high grinding pressure to be applied for efficient hardbanding removal while automatically compensating for any pipe movement or walk through real-time position adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate and efficient removal of hardbanding without under or over grinding, reducing rework and improving consistency, while maintaining precision and accuracy even with eccentric or curved tubulars.

Implementation Method 1

a shock absorber slidably engaging a second end of the piston rod and coupled to the support arm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 2

The friction between the idler wheel and tubular surface prevents lateral movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10525565B2Method of removing hardbanding from pipe
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 ATT TECH LTD
  • US10525565B2 patent drawing
  • US10525565B2 patent drawing
  • US10525565B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a hardbanding removal apparatus and method for use with oilfield tubulars and downhole tools. The apparatus includes a tiltable frame with support arm, a grinding wheel coupled to the support arm, and an idler wheel assembly to supply mechanical feedback to the grinding wheel through the support arm. The mechanical feedback allows the grinding wheel to remove hardbanding accurately and uniformly on tubulars that are eccentric, curved, or have eccentric hardbanding. The tiltable frame enables grinding of tapered sections of the tubular without reorienting the tubular. The method includes removing hardbanding using the apparatus.