Hardware Compatibility Judgment for Transmission Interfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face inconveniences due to unexplained errors and underutilization of image capture devices caused by hardware incompatibility issues with transmission interfaces, as they lack knowledge about the detailed specifications of these interfaces and their components.

Innovation Solution

A hardware compatibility judgment method that captures interface information, compares it with a compatibility database, determines compatibility, and provides recommendations for resolving incompatibilities, including testing transmission rates and bandwidths, and recommending suitable interfaces or configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users connect image capture devices to transmission interfaces without knowledge of interface specifications, then device connectivity is achieved, but hardware incompatibility errors occur and device performance cannot be fully utilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of connecting devicesVSAvoidhardware compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects interface information (such as PCIe generation, lane configuration, and link speed) and compares it against a compatibility database to provide feedback to users about compatibility status and recommended configurations, enabling users to make informed decisions without needing to understand technical specifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A software intermediary layer is introduced between the user and the hardware interface, which automatically queries interface specifications, compares them with device requirements, and provides compatibility assessment and recommendations, shielding users from complex technical details while ensuring reliable connectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If transmission interfaces are manufactured at different quality levels, then product variety and market options increase, but hardware incompatibility and performance degradation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission interface varietyVSAvoidhardware compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system queries and analyzes specific interface parameters such as PCIe generation (3.0, 4.0, 5.0), lane configuration (x1, x4, x8, x16), and link speed (2.5Gbps, 5.0Gbps, 10Gbps) to determine compatibility, allowing the system to adapt to various interface quality levels and provide appropriate compatibility assessments for each configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If users attempt to resolve hardware incompatibility through trial and error, then eventually a working configuration may be found, but time is wasted and user experience is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware compatibilityVSAvoidtime to resolve incompatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary compatibility assessment by automatically detecting interface information and comparing it with the compatibility database before the user attempts to use the device, providing advance warnings and recommendations to prevent incompatibility issues rather than resolving them after problems occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11354214B2Judgment method for hardware compatibility
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 AVERMEDIA TECH
  • US11354214B2 patent drawing
  • US11354214B2 patent drawing
  • US11354214B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A judgment method for hardware compatibility is disclosed. The judgment method is operated with a first electrical device and a second electrical device having a plurality of transmission interfaces. The judgment method is started after the first electrical device electrically connected to one of the transmission interfaces of the second electrical device. The judgment method includes an interface information capturing process, a compatibility comparison process, a compatibility determination process and a recommendation execution process. In the interface information capturing process, the interface information of the transmission interface of the second electrical device connected to the first electrical device is captured. In the compatibility comparison process, the interface information is compared with a compatibility database to obtain a comparison result. In the compatibility determination process, the comparison result is compared with the interface information of another transmission interface of the second electrical device to obtain a determination result. In the recommendation execution process, a recommendation information is provided according to the determination result.